MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.02.012

Медицинская библиотека · Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2007

Allergen vial mixing and immunotherapy: Risks of infections and vial contamination.

Lay P Chase, Bass Richard, Lin Sandra Y

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To study the risks of vial contamination and infection associated with immunotherapy vial mixing and injection.

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective review of patient immunotherapy records from January 2000-June 2006.

SETTING

Tertiary care outpatient otolaryngology clinic.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-two patients were given 26,795 injections (average of 98.5 injections per patient). Three hundred ninety-nine total local reactions were reported by the subjects (1.49%; 95% CI 1.34%-1.63%). The majority (82%) of the local reactions occurred during escalation dosing. There were 23 episodes of wheezing or shortness of breath after injections (9.6 of 10,000). No patients experienced anaphylaxis. There was no documented skin or systemic infections as a result of the allergy injections. None of the patients experienced fever, discharge from the injection site, cellulitis, or required antibiotics.

CONCLUSION

This review of immunotherapy records revealed no complications of infection from the preparation and administration of immunotherapy performed in an outpatient clinic.

Для цитирования: Lay P Chase, Bass Richard, Lin Sandra Y. Allergen vial mixing and immunotherapy: Risks of infections and vial contamination.. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.02.012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.