Acta cardiologica · 2003
Lowering of furosemide dosage after clinical stabilization in patients with congestive heart failure.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alexopoulos George P, Anastasiou-Nana Maria I, Rapti Ageliki Ch, Margari Zafiria J, Terrovitis John V, Mitsibounas Dimitrios, Makri Stamatina, Nanas John N
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to examine the safety of reducing the long-term doses of furosemide administered to patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) stabilized on a standard medical treatment.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients with advanced CHF were treated with enalapril, digoxin, nitrates, and furosemide, as needed to alleviate their symptoms, and remained clinically stable for at least 3 months on those doses. Subsequently, the daily dose of furosemide was reduced to 1/3 of the previous dose, while the concomitant therapy was unchanged. All patients underwent a thorough clinical evaluation and right-heart catheterization before and 2 months after the furosemide dose reduction. After the treatment optimization the NYHA functional class decreased from 2.3 +/- 0.6 to 1.4 +/- 0.6 (p = 0.000), and the left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 22 +/- 10% to 32 +/- 13%, (p = 0.000). Clinical and haemodynamic evaluation before and after 2 months of treatment with lower furosemide doses showed that 24 of the 29 patients (83%) remained in a stable NYHA functional class and maintained a stable haemodynamic status. In the remaining 5 patients (17%), mean NYHA functional class increased from 1.8 +/- 0.4 to 2.4 +/- 0.6 (p = 0.07), accompanied by a significant increase of the right and left ventricular filling pressures from 4.2 +/- 2.7 to 9.0 +/- 3.0 mm Hg, p = 0.018 and from 8.6 +/- 3.0 to 19.8 +/- 3.6 mm Hg, p = 0.017, respectively. These 5 patients returned to a stable clinical status upon resumption of the prior doses of furosemide.
CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with chronic CHF who were clinically stabilized on high doses of furosemide remained stable on a maintenance dose equal to one-third of the dose needed for their stabilization. Patients unable to tolerate the dose reduction regained their previous clinical status following the resumption of the prior diuretic doses.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients with advanced CHF were treated with enalapril, digoxin, nitrates, and furosemide, as needed to alleviate their symptoms, and remained clinically stable for at least 3 months on those doses. Subsequently, the daily dose of furosemide was reduced to 1/3 of the previous dose, while the concomitant therapy was unchanged. All patients underwent a thorough clinical evaluation and right-heart catheterization before and 2 months after the furosemide dose reduction. After the treatment optimization the NYHA functional class decreased from 2.3 +/- 0.6 to 1.4 +/- 0.6 (p = 0.000), and the left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 22 +/- 10% to 32 +/- 13%, (p = 0.000). Clinical and haemodynamic evaluation before and after 2 months of treatment with lower furosemide doses showed that 24 of the 29 patients (83%) remained in a stable NYHA functional class and maintained a stable haemodynamic status. In the remaining 5 patients (17%), mean NYHA functional class increased from 1.8 +/- 0.4 to 2.4 +/- 0.6 (p = 0.07), accompanied by a significant increase of the right and left ventricular filling pressures from 4.2 +/- 2.7 to 9.0 +/- 3.0 mm Hg, p = 0.018 and from 8.6 +/- 3.0 to 19.8 +/- 3.6 mm Hg, p = 0.017, respectively. These 5 patients returned to a stable clinical status upon resumption of the prior doses of furosemide.
CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with chronic CHF who were clinically stabilized on high doses of furosemide remained stable on a maintenance dose equal to one-third of the dose needed for their stabilization. Patients unable to tolerate the dose reduction regained their previous clinical status following the resumption of the prior diuretic doses.