Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
Autonomic modulation impacts conduction velocity dynamics and wavefront propagation in the left atrium.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Honarbakhsh Shohreh, Roney Caroline, Horrach Caterina Vidal, Lambiase Pier D, Hunter Ross J
Аннотация
AIMS: Atrial fibrosis and autonomic remodelling are proposed pathophysiological mechanisms in atrial fibrillation (AF). Their impact on conduction velocity (CV) dynamics and wavefront propagation was evaluated.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Local activation times (LATs), voltage, and geometry data were obtained from patients undergoing ablation for persistent AF. LATs were obtained at three pacing intervals (PIs) in sinus rhythm (SR). LATs were used to determine CV dynamics and their relationship to local voltage amplitude. The impact of autonomic modulation- pharmacologically and with ganglionated plexi (GP) stimulation, on CV dynamics, wavefront propagation, and pivot points (change in wavefront propagation of ≥90°) was determined in SR. Fifty-four patients were included. Voltage impacted CV dynamics whereby at non-low voltage zones (LVZs) (≥0.5 mV) the CV restitution curves are steeper [0.03 ± 0.03 m/s ΔCV PI 600-400 ms (PI1), 0.54 ± 0.09 m/s ΔCV PI 400-250 ms (PI2)], broader at LVZ (0.2-0.49 mV) (0.17 ± 0.09 m/s ΔCV PI1, 0.25 ± 0.11 m/s ΔCV PI2), and flat at very LVZ (<0.2 mV) (0.03 ± 0.01 m/s ΔCV PI1, 0.04 ± 0.02 m/s ΔCV PI2). Atropine did not change CV dynamics, while isoprenaline and GP stimulation resulted in greater CV slowing with rate. Isoprenaline (2.7 ± 1.1 increase/patient) and GP stimulation (2.8 ± 1.3 increase/patient) promoted CV heterogeneity, i.e. rate-dependent CV (RDCV) slowing sites. Most pivot points co-located to RDCV slowing sites (80.2%). Isoprenaline (1.3 ± 1.1 pivot increase/patient) and GP stimulation (1.5 ± 1.1 increase/patient) also enhanced the number of pivot points identified.
CONCLUSION: Atrial CV dynamics is affected by fibrosis burden and influenced by autonomic modulation which enhances CV heterogeneity and distribution of pivot points. This study provides further insight into the impact of autonomic remodelling in AF.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Local activation times (LATs), voltage, and geometry data were obtained from patients undergoing ablation for persistent AF. LATs were obtained at three pacing intervals (PIs) in sinus rhythm (SR). LATs were used to determine CV dynamics and their relationship to local voltage amplitude. The impact of autonomic modulation- pharmacologically and with ganglionated plexi (GP) stimulation, on CV dynamics, wavefront propagation, and pivot points (change in wavefront propagation of ≥90°) was determined in SR. Fifty-four patients were included. Voltage impacted CV dynamics whereby at non-low voltage zones (LVZs) (≥0.5 mV) the CV restitution curves are steeper [0.03 ± 0.03 m/s ΔCV PI 600-400 ms (PI1), 0.54 ± 0.09 m/s ΔCV PI 400-250 ms (PI2)], broader at LVZ (0.2-0.49 mV) (0.17 ± 0.09 m/s ΔCV PI1, 0.25 ± 0.11 m/s ΔCV PI2), and flat at very LVZ (<0.2 mV) (0.03 ± 0.01 m/s ΔCV PI1, 0.04 ± 0.02 m/s ΔCV PI2). Atropine did not change CV dynamics, while isoprenaline and GP stimulation resulted in greater CV slowing with rate. Isoprenaline (2.7 ± 1.1 increase/patient) and GP stimulation (2.8 ± 1.3 increase/patient) promoted CV heterogeneity, i.e. rate-dependent CV (RDCV) slowing sites. Most pivot points co-located to RDCV slowing sites (80.2%). Isoprenaline (1.3 ± 1.1 pivot increase/patient) and GP stimulation (1.5 ± 1.1 increase/patient) also enhanced the number of pivot points identified.
CONCLUSION: Atrial CV dynamics is affected by fibrosis burden and influenced by autonomic modulation which enhances CV heterogeneity and distribution of pivot points. This study provides further insight into the impact of autonomic remodelling in AF.