European journal of heart failure · 2024
Empagliflozin to prevent worsening of left ventricular volumes and systolic function after myocardial infarction (EMPRESS-MI).
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Carberry Jaclyn, Petrie Mark C, Lee Matthew M Y, Stanley Bethany, Brooksbank Katriona J M, Campbell Ross T, Good Richard, Jhund Pardeep S, Kellman Peter, Lang Ninian N, Lindsay M Mitchell, Mangion Kenneth, Gardner Roy S, Mark Patrick B, Meyer Barbara, O'Donnell Joanne, Orchard Vanessa, Shaukat Aadil, Watkins Stuart, McConnachie Alex, McMurray John J V, Welsh Paul, Sattar Naveed, Berry Colin, Docherty Kieran F
Аннотация
AIMS: Patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) following an acute myocardial infarction (MI) are considered to be at risk of progressive adverse cardiac remodelling which can lead to the development of heart failure and death. The early addition of a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor to standard treatment may delay or prevent progressive adverse remodelling in these patients.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction following MI. Eligible patients were those ≥12 h and ≤14 days following acute MI, with an LVEF <45% by MRI. Patients were randomized to empagliflozin 10 mg once a day or matching placebo. The primary outcome was the change in left ventricular end-systolic volume indexed to body surface area (LVESVI) from baseline to 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes included measures of left ventricular and atrial volumes, left ventricular mass, LVEF, and high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-TnI) and N-terminal prohormone of B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentrations. From October 2022 to January 2024, 105 eligible patients were randomized. The mean age was 63 ± 11 years and 90 (87%) were male. The mean LVEF was 34.8 ± 6.0%. In the placebo group, LVESVI decreased by 7.8 ± 16.3 ml/m2, left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) did not change (-0.3 ± 18.7 ml/m2) and LVEF increased by 8.5 ± 7.4% at 24 weeks from baseline. Empagliflozin did not affect the change in LVESVI from baseline to 24 weeks (between-group difference = 0.3 ml/m2, 95% confidence interval -5.2 to 5.8; p = 0.92). Compared with placebo, empagliflozin also had no effect on LVEDVI, LVEF, left atrial volume index, left ventricular mass index, NT-proBNP, or hs-TnI, but did increase haematocrit and reduced uric acid and weight.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction after an acute MI receiving contemporary standard of care, treatment with empagliflozin had no effect on cardiac volumes or LVEF compared with placebo. Progressive adverse cardiac remodelling did not occur in the majority of patients.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction following MI. Eligible patients were those ≥12 h and ≤14 days following acute MI, with an LVEF <45% by MRI. Patients were randomized to empagliflozin 10 mg once a day or matching placebo. The primary outcome was the change in left ventricular end-systolic volume indexed to body surface area (LVESVI) from baseline to 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes included measures of left ventricular and atrial volumes, left ventricular mass, LVEF, and high-sensitivity troponin I (hs-TnI) and N-terminal prohormone of B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentrations. From October 2022 to January 2024, 105 eligible patients were randomized. The mean age was 63 ± 11 years and 90 (87%) were male. The mean LVEF was 34.8 ± 6.0%. In the placebo group, LVESVI decreased by 7.8 ± 16.3 ml/m2, left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) did not change (-0.3 ± 18.7 ml/m2) and LVEF increased by 8.5 ± 7.4% at 24 weeks from baseline. Empagliflozin did not affect the change in LVESVI from baseline to 24 weeks (between-group difference = 0.3 ml/m2, 95% confidence interval -5.2 to 5.8; p = 0.92). Compared with placebo, empagliflozin also had no effect on LVEDVI, LVEF, left atrial volume index, left ventricular mass index, NT-proBNP, or hs-TnI, but did increase haematocrit and reduced uric acid and weight.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction after an acute MI receiving contemporary standard of care, treatment with empagliflozin had no effect on cardiac volumes or LVEF compared with placebo. Progressive adverse cardiac remodelling did not occur in the majority of patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBenzhydryl CompoundsDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodGlucosidesHeart VentriclesMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMyocardial InfarctionSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsStroke VolumeSystoleTreatment OutcomeVentricular Dysfunction, LeftVentricular Function, LeftVentricular RemodelingPeptide FragmentsNatriuretic Peptide, Brain