MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/diagnostics11112120

Медицинская библиотека · Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021

Screening of Keratoconus Using Autokeratometer and Keratometer Keratoconus Index.

Kojima Takashi, Isogai Naoki, Nishida Tomoya, Nakamura Tomoaki, Ichikawa Kazuo

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The keratometer keratoconus index (KKI) is a diagnostic index for the risk of keratoconus calculated from autokeratometer test values. We partially modified the KKI equation and assessed it without limiting the target age and severity of keratoconus. This retrospective study included 179 eyes of 99 patients with keratoconus and 468 eyes from 235 normal controls. In the modified KKI, oblique astigmatism or against-the-rule astigmatism was defined as ≥1D astigmatism. KKI diagnostic power was analyzed in subgroups of <50 and ≥50-year-old patients, and at different keratoconus stages. Although the sensitivity of modified KKI was comparable with that of original KKI (92.7% vs. 95.5%), modified KKI specificity was significantly higher (79.7% vs. 68.6%) (p = 0.0001). Using the modified KKI, sensitivity reached 100% (4/4) and specificity, 63.5% (33/52), in ≥50-year-old patients, while overall sensitivity in keratoconus ≥stage 2 was 100% (30/30). In conclusion, the modified KKI proved to be effective in keratoconus screening at all stages. However, it should be noted that false-positive frequency is higher in ≥50-year-old patients.

Для цитирования: Kojima Takashi, Isogai Naoki, Nishida Tomoya, Nakamura Tomoaki, Ichikawa Kazuo. Screening of Keratoconus Using Autokeratometer and Keratometer Keratoconus Index.. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2021. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11112120.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.