MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/03009734.2019.1616339

Медицинская библиотека · Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2019

A national survey on routines regarding sedation in Swedish intensive care units.

Talsi Oskar, Kiiski Berggren Ritva, Johansson Göran, Winsö Ola

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Background

Previous studies concerning sedation in Swedish intensive care units (ICU) have shown variability in drug choices and strategies. Currently, there are no national guidelines on this topic. As an update to a Nordic survey from 2004, and as a follow-up to a recently introduced quality indicator from the Swedish Intensive Care Registry, we performed a national survey.

Methods

A digital survey was sent to the ICUs in Sweden, asking for sedation routines regarding hypnosedatives, analgosedatives, protocols, sedation scales, etc.

Results

Fifty out of 80 ICUs responded to the survey. All units used sedation scales, and 88% used the RASS scale; 80% used written guidelines for sedation. Propofol and dexmedetomidine were the preferred short-term hypnosedatives. Propofol, dexmedetomidine, and midazolam were preferred for long-term hypnosedation. Remifentanil, morphine, and fentanyl were the most frequently used agents for analgosedation.

Conclusions

All ICUs used a sedation scale, an increase compared with previous studies. Concerning the choice of hypno- and analgosedatives, the use of dexmedetomidine, clonidine, and remifentanil has increased, and the use of benzodiazepines has decreased since the Nordic survey in 2004.

Для цитирования: Talsi Oskar, Kiiski Berggren Ritva, Johansson Göran, Winsö Ola. A national survey on routines regarding sedation in Swedish intensive care units.. Upsala journal of medical sciences. 2019. DOI: 10.1080/03009734.2019.1616339.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.