Clinical nuclear medicine · 2003
Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy for bronchial carcinoid follow-up.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fanti Stefano, Farsad Mohsen, Battista Giuseppe, Monetti Francesco, Montini Gian Carlo, Chiti Arturo, Savelli Giordano, Petrella Francesco, Bini Alessandro, Nanni Cristina, Romeo Annadina, Franchi Roberto, Bombardieri Emilio, Canini Romeo, Monetti Nino
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) has been used to diagnose bronchial carcinoids (BC) and is a valuable tool for accurate staging of BC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of SRS in restaging BC and following patients after treatment.
METHODS: Thirty-one patients (18 male, 13 female) with confirmed BC who were referred during the last 7 years were included. Patients were examined via chest radiograph (12 studies), chest or abdominal computed tomography (CT; 28 scans), chest magnetic resonance imaging (2 scans), and liver ultrasound (5 scans).
RESULTS: Overall, in 22 patients (71%), SRS confirmed the data obtained by other diagnostic procedures (16 negative and 6 positive findings). In 6 patients, SRS showed focal lesions not previously demonstrated. In 2 patients, SRS resolved uncertain findings of CT. In 1 patient, SRS showed fewer lesions compared with CT. In 8 of 31 patients, important diagnostic information obtained by SRS was not revealed by any other imaging procedure.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that SRS is a reliable, noninvasive method that could be considered the principal follow-up procedure in patients with BC.
METHODS: Thirty-one patients (18 male, 13 female) with confirmed BC who were referred during the last 7 years were included. Patients were examined via chest radiograph (12 studies), chest or abdominal computed tomography (CT; 28 scans), chest magnetic resonance imaging (2 scans), and liver ultrasound (5 scans).
RESULTS: Overall, in 22 patients (71%), SRS confirmed the data obtained by other diagnostic procedures (16 negative and 6 positive findings). In 6 patients, SRS showed focal lesions not previously demonstrated. In 2 patients, SRS resolved uncertain findings of CT. In 1 patient, SRS showed fewer lesions compared with CT. In 8 of 31 patients, important diagnostic information obtained by SRS was not revealed by any other imaging procedure.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that SRS is a reliable, noninvasive method that could be considered the principal follow-up procedure in patients with BC.