Journal of hazardous materials · 2011
Influence of injection conditions on EDDS-flushing of metal-contaminated soil.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lo Irene M C, Tsang Daniel C W, Yip Theo C M, Wang Fei, Zhang Weihua
Аннотация
This study evaluated the design of step-gradient, single-pulse, multi-pulse, and continuous injection of biodegradable EDDS ([S,S]-ethylene-diamine-disuccinic acid, under the same total dosage) and the significance of pore-water velocities during in situ soil flushing. In view of the metal breakthrough and extraction efficiency of each injection mode, single-pulse injection was found to be the least effective for all metals. Multi-pulse injection was consistently more effective than single-pulse injection, although the efficiency of second and third pulse injections significantly diminished. Continuous injection offered a simple operation and the greatest Ni and Cu extraction, whereas step-gradient injection was the best option for Zn and Pb extraction because it mitigated the influence of metal exchange. Moreover, a rinsing step with a background solution following the initial injection of the multi-pulse injection removed newly formed metal-EDDS complexes from soil pores effectively before further EDDS-flushing. A decrease in pore-water velocity provided a longer residence time for greater Ni and Cu extraction, but also enhanced the rate-limited metal exchange of Zn-EDDS and Pb-EDDS complexes and thus hindered Zn and Pb extraction. These results suggest a slower and continuous injection for the best Ni or Cu removal, but a faster and step-gradient injection for Zn or Pb removal.