Annals of clinical and laboratory science · 2017
Percent cPRA (Calculated Panel Reactive Antibody) Value Predicts Percent of Positive Platelet Crossmatches.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Modi Nishit B, Dresser Mark, Desai Dhaval, Edgar Christopher, Wesnes Keith
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Platelet refractoriness or lack of platelet increase after platelet transfusion is seen in patients receiving chronic platelet transfusion support. Antibodies may develop against human platelet antigens (HPA) and/or against HLA class I antigens. Crossmatch (XM) compatible platelets or HLA-identical or HLA-compatible platelets are typically used to manage transfusion refractoriness. We aimed to determine if percent calculated Panel Reactive Antibody (% cPRA) against class I HLA antigens could predict percent positive platelet XM when looking for compatible transfusion products.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all platelet XM performed at our institution between 2008-2012 was performed, and patient characteristics recorded. For each patient, the percentage of all positive platelet XM performed was calculated and compared with the corresponding % cPRA levels against class I HLA antigens.
RESULTS: Mean and median % positive platelet XM for all 50 patients tested in the period 2008-2012 were 61% and 60% (range 0-100%), respectively. Mean and median % cPRA levels were 66% and 68% (range 0-100%), respectively. No correlation was seen between age, sex, race, or diagnosis and positive platelet XM results.
CONCLUSION: The results of our study indicate that the % cPRA correlates well with the % positive platelet XM. Thus, a higher % cPRA alerts the blood bank that additional platelets will be required for XM and/or that it would be beneficial to request HLA-identical or compatible units.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all platelet XM performed at our institution between 2008-2012 was performed, and patient characteristics recorded. For each patient, the percentage of all positive platelet XM performed was calculated and compared with the corresponding % cPRA levels against class I HLA antigens.
RESULTS: Mean and median % positive platelet XM for all 50 patients tested in the period 2008-2012 were 61% and 60% (range 0-100%), respectively. Mean and median % cPRA levels were 66% and 68% (range 0-100%), respectively. No correlation was seen between age, sex, race, or diagnosis and positive platelet XM results.
CONCLUSION: The results of our study indicate that the % cPRA correlates well with the % positive platelet XM. Thus, a higher % cPRA alerts the blood bank that additional platelets will be required for XM and/or that it would be beneficial to request HLA-identical or compatible units.