Therapeutic drug monitoring · 2013
Quetiapine and norquetiapine serum concentrations and clinical effects in depressed patients under augmentation therapy with quetiapine.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ostad Haji Elnaz, Wagner Stefanie, Fric Mirijam, Laux Gerd, Pittermann Patrick, Röschke Joachim, Hiemke Christoph
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Quetiapine has been recently approved as an add-on therapy in the treatment of major depressive disorders in the case of inadequate response to antidepressant monotherapy. Thereby the antidepressant potential is attributed to the N-demethylated metabolite norquetiapine (NQ). The aim of this cross-sectional analysis was to relate quetiapine (Q) doses to serum concentrations of Q and its active metabolite and clinical effects.
METHODS: Data were obtained from patients who had been treated with different antidepressants and augmented under naturalistic conditions with Q for whom blood level measurements were requested.
RESULTS: For this analysis, 105 depressed patients were included who had been augmented with Q. The mean daily doses of Q were 222 ± 125 mg. Doses correlated significantly (P < 0.001) with the highly variable serum concentrations of both Q and NQ. Median serum concentrations of Q and NQ were 46 ng/mL (25th to 75th percentile 20-91 ng/mL) and 59 ng/mL (25th to 75th percentile 26-133 ng/mL), respectively. Concentrations per dose ranged from 0.10 to 0.58 ng·ml·mg for Q and from 0.17 to 0.59 ng·ml·mg for NQ. Most patients (55%) received comedications in addition to the antidepressant drug and Q. According to the clinical global impressions scale, 60% of the patients were either much (36%) or very much improved (24%). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis revealed no significant differences of serum concentrations between responders and nonresponders for NQ (P = 0.835) but a trend for Q (P = 0.056).
CONCLUSIONS: Due to marked variability of Q and NQ concentrations in the blood, therapeutic drug monitoring may be helpful to identify pharmacokinetic peculiarities. The lack of correlation between serum concentrations of NQ and clinical improvement casts doubts on the concept that NQ is the pharmacologically active principle for the augmentation therapy.
METHODS: Data were obtained from patients who had been treated with different antidepressants and augmented under naturalistic conditions with Q for whom blood level measurements were requested.
RESULTS: For this analysis, 105 depressed patients were included who had been augmented with Q. The mean daily doses of Q were 222 ± 125 mg. Doses correlated significantly (P < 0.001) with the highly variable serum concentrations of both Q and NQ. Median serum concentrations of Q and NQ were 46 ng/mL (25th to 75th percentile 20-91 ng/mL) and 59 ng/mL (25th to 75th percentile 26-133 ng/mL), respectively. Concentrations per dose ranged from 0.10 to 0.58 ng·ml·mg for Q and from 0.17 to 0.59 ng·ml·mg for NQ. Most patients (55%) received comedications in addition to the antidepressant drug and Q. According to the clinical global impressions scale, 60% of the patients were either much (36%) or very much improved (24%). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis revealed no significant differences of serum concentrations between responders and nonresponders for NQ (P = 0.835) but a trend for Q (P = 0.056).
CONCLUSIONS: Due to marked variability of Q and NQ concentrations in the blood, therapeutic drug monitoring may be helpful to identify pharmacokinetic peculiarities. The lack of correlation between serum concentrations of NQ and clinical improvement casts doubts on the concept that NQ is the pharmacologically active principle for the augmentation therapy.