Scientific reports · 2021
Evaluation of a saliva molecular point of care for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in ambulatory care.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
LeGoff Jérôme, Kernéis Solen, Elie Caroline, Mercier-Delarue Séverine, Gastli Nabil, Choupeaux Laure, Fourgeaud Jacques, Alby Marie-Laure, Quentin Pierre, Pavie Juliette, Brazille Patricia, Néré Marie Laure, Minier Marine, Gabassi Audrey, Leroy Chrystel, Parfait Béatrice, Tréluyer Jean-Marc, Delaugerre Constance
Аннотация
Rapid identification of SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals is a cornerstone for the control of virus spread. The sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection by RT-PCR is similar in saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs. Rapid molecular point-of-care tests in saliva could facilitate, broaden and speed up the diagnosis. We conducted a prospective study in two community COVID-19 screening centers to evaluate the performances of a CE-marked RT-LAMP assay (EasyCoV) designed for the detection of SARS-CoV2 RNA from fresh saliva samples, compared to nasopharyngeal RT-PCR, to saliva RT-PCR and to nasopharyngeal antigen testing. Overall, 117 of the 1718 participants (7%) tested positive with nasopharyngeal RT-PCR. Compared to nasopharyngeal RT-PCR, the sensitivity and specificity of the RT-LAMP assay in saliva were 34% and 97%, respectively. The Ct values of nasopharyngeal RT-PCR were significantly lower in the 40 true positive subjects with saliva RT-LAMP (Ct 25.9) than in the 48 false negative subjects with saliva RT-LAMP (Ct 28.4) (p = 0.028). Considering six alternate criteria for reference tests, including saliva RT-PCR and nasopharyngeal antigen, the sensitivity of saliva RT-LAMP ranged between 27 and 44%. The detection of SARS-CoV-2 in crude saliva samples with an RT-LAMP assay had a lower sensitivity than nasopharyngeal RT-PCR, saliva RT-PCR and nasopharyngeal antigen testing.Registration number: NCT04578509.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAmbulatory CareCOVID-19COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMolecular MedicineNasopharynxNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPoint-of-Care SystemsPoint-of-Care TestingProspective StudiesRNA, ViralReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2SalivaSensitivity and Specificity