European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2020
Effectiveness of surgical fixation for rib fractures in relation to its timing: a retrospective Japanese nationwide study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Otaka Shunichi, Aso Shotaro, Matsui Hiroki, Fushimi Kiyohide, Yasunaga Hideo
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The effectiveness of surgical rib fixation is currently controversial, partly because of differences in timing. We used a Japanese nationwide database to investigate the effectiveness of surgical rib fixation in relation to its timing.
METHODS: We used the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database to identify patients with rib fractures who underwent mechanical ventilation from 1 July 2010 to 31 March 2018. We performed overlap weight analysis to compare in-hospital outcomes between patients who had and had not undergone surgical rib fixation within 3, 6 or 10 days after admission. The primary outcomes were duration of mechanical ventilation and post-rib fixation length of hospital stay. The secondary outcomes were tracheostomy, post-admission pneumonia and all-cause 28-day in-hospital mortality.
RESULTS: We identified 8922 eligible patients. Surgical rib fixation within 3 days after admission was associated with shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (percent difference, - 42.9%; 95% confidence interval, - 57.4 to - 23.3) and shorter hospital stay (percent difference, - 19.6%; 95% confidence interval, - 31.8 to - 5.2). There were no significant differences between the groups in tracheostomy (risk difference, - 0.04; 95% confidence interval, - 0.15 to 0.07), post-admission pneumonia (risk difference, - 0.04; 95% confidence interval, - 0.13 to 0.05) or all-cause 28-day in-hospital mortality (risk difference, - 0.02; 95% confidence interval, - 0.07 to 0.03). However, there were no significant differences in any in-hospital outcomes between those who had and had not undergone rib fixation within 6 or 10 days after admission.
CONCLUSION: Early surgical rib fixation was associated with better in-hospital outcomes, whereas later surgical rib fixation was not.
METHODS: We used the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database to identify patients with rib fractures who underwent mechanical ventilation from 1 July 2010 to 31 March 2018. We performed overlap weight analysis to compare in-hospital outcomes between patients who had and had not undergone surgical rib fixation within 3, 6 or 10 days after admission. The primary outcomes were duration of mechanical ventilation and post-rib fixation length of hospital stay. The secondary outcomes were tracheostomy, post-admission pneumonia and all-cause 28-day in-hospital mortality.
RESULTS: We identified 8922 eligible patients. Surgical rib fixation within 3 days after admission was associated with shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (percent difference, - 42.9%; 95% confidence interval, - 57.4 to - 23.3) and shorter hospital stay (percent difference, - 19.6%; 95% confidence interval, - 31.8 to - 5.2). There were no significant differences between the groups in tracheostomy (risk difference, - 0.04; 95% confidence interval, - 0.15 to 0.07), post-admission pneumonia (risk difference, - 0.04; 95% confidence interval, - 0.13 to 0.05) or all-cause 28-day in-hospital mortality (risk difference, - 0.02; 95% confidence interval, - 0.07 to 0.03). However, there were no significant differences in any in-hospital outcomes between those who had and had not undergone rib fixation within 6 or 10 days after admission.
CONCLUSION: Early surgical rib fixation was associated with better in-hospital outcomes, whereas later surgical rib fixation was not.