MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00702-006-0614-3

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2007

Nature and variants of idiopathic restless legs syndrome: observations from 152 patients referred to secondary care in the UK.

Holmes R, Tluk S, Metta V, Patel P, Rao R, Williams A, Chaudhuri K R

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Heterogeneity in clinical presentation and daytime somnolence in restless legs syndrome (RLS) have been poorly explored in the UK.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

Analysis of database of 152 cases of primary RLS compiled from clinical consultation using a structured questionnaire administration and clinical examination, spanning six years of referral. Standard evaluations included use of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Secondary RLS was excluded and polysomnography performed in some when clinically indicated.

RESULTS

The mean duration of RLS before appropriate treatment initiation was 12.7 years (age range of patients 26-90 years). 79% of patients had insomnia while 30% had excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). Severe pain, restless arms and paroxysmal RLS causing lifestyle alterations also occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that there is considerable delay before appropriate therapy in RLS. A large number have EDS and insomnia among others, is the commonest presenting feature. Phenotypic heterogeneity may cause diagnostic difficulty.

Для цитирования: Holmes R, Tluk S, Metta V, Patel P, Rao R, Williams A, Chaudhuri K R. Nature and variants of idiopathic restless legs syndrome: observations from 152 patients referred to secondary care in the UK.. Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996). 2007. DOI: 10.1007/s00702-006-0614-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.