MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf02624674

Медицинская библиотека · Acta diabetologica latina · 1986

Bedside diagnosis of cardiac autonomic damage by computerized analysis of heart rate-respiration relationship.

Bernardi L, Calciati A, Marti G, Ricordi L, Rossi M, Fratino P

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In this study we propose a method for the analysis of the relationship between heart rate changes and respiration as a possible diagnostic tool for cardiac autonomic damage. The method consists in recording R-R intervals and respiratory amplitude by a suitably equipped personal computer, and by evaluating the cross-correlation peak between the two signals. This mathematical function appeared to be more sensitive to the degree of concordance between the two signals, rather than their absolute amplitude. The cross-correlation appeared to be lower in diabetics with autonomic dysfunction, markedly decreased after injection of atropine (only in normals), slightly increased after propranolol. Hyperpnea increased the cross-correlation peak between 3-18 breaths/min in normals, but only at lower frequencies, if at all, in diabetic subjects with various degrees of autonomic dysfunction. The cross-correlation showed the best reproducibility among R-R change tests. These preliminary results suggest that this method may provide new information on autonomic integrity and a substantial advantage in terms of reproducibility.

Для цитирования: Bernardi L, Calciati A, Marti G, Ricordi L, Rossi M, Fratino P. Bedside diagnosis of cardiac autonomic damage by computerized analysis of heart rate-respiration relationship.. Acta diabetologica latina. 1986. DOI: 10.1007/bf02624674.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.