Pancreas · 2021
Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients With Insulinoma Treated by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Ethanol Injection.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yuan Tao, Liu Shixuan, Zhu Cheng, Dong Yingyue, Zhu Huijuan, Wu Xi, Tang Yan, Zhao Weigang
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to analyze the continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) profiles of patients with insulinoma before and after treatment with endoscopic ultrasound-guided ethanol injection and assess the value of CGM in curative effect evaluating.
METHODS: We included 8 patients, and CGM was performed for 3 to 5 days before and after treatment.
RESULTS: The proportion of monitoring points at which the glucose level was lower than 3.9 mmol/L after treatment decreased in patient 5 (from 4% to 3%) and patient 8 (from 30% to 12%), whereas the proportion increased in patient 1 (from 1% to 16%), patient 3 (from 5% to 23%), and patient 7 (from 7% to 63%). There was no mean significant difference between CGM values (5.75 [standard deviation, 2.49] mmol/L) and self-monitoring of blood glucose values (5.76 [standard deviation, 2.32] mmol/L) (P > 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed positive correlation between CGM values and self-monitoring of blood glucose values (r = 0.88, P < 0.05). Clarke Error Grid Analysis showed that 91.5% of pairs were located in areas A and B.
CONCLUSIONS: Continuous glucose monitoring is useful for detecting hypoglycemia and evaluating curative effect, but the correction of fingertip blood glucose is necessary when the blood glucose is relatively low.
METHODS: We included 8 patients, and CGM was performed for 3 to 5 days before and after treatment.
RESULTS: The proportion of monitoring points at which the glucose level was lower than 3.9 mmol/L after treatment decreased in patient 5 (from 4% to 3%) and patient 8 (from 30% to 12%), whereas the proportion increased in patient 1 (from 1% to 16%), patient 3 (from 5% to 23%), and patient 7 (from 7% to 63%). There was no mean significant difference between CGM values (5.75 [standard deviation, 2.49] mmol/L) and self-monitoring of blood glucose values (5.76 [standard deviation, 2.32] mmol/L) (P > 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed positive correlation between CGM values and self-monitoring of blood glucose values (r = 0.88, P < 0.05). Clarke Error Grid Analysis showed that 91.5% of pairs were located in areas A and B.
CONCLUSIONS: Continuous glucose monitoring is useful for detecting hypoglycemia and evaluating curative effect, but the correction of fingertip blood glucose is necessary when the blood glucose is relatively low.