Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2018
Erythromycin and Reflux Events in Premature Neonates: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ballengee Cortney R, Davalian Faranek, Conaway Mark R, Sauer Cary G, Kaufman David A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in premature neonates may manifest as apnea, bradycardia, growth failure, aspiration, or feeding intolerance. Erythromycin ethylsuccinate (EES), is often used as a pro-kinetic in the management of GERD, despite lack of evidence or safety from randomized controlled trials. We sought to study the efficacy of enteral EES at a dose of 50 mg · kg · day in decreasing the frequency of gastroesophageal reflux events as determined by pH-multichannel intraluminal impedance (pH-MII) monitoring.
METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, eligible premature neonates with clinical signs of GERD underwent 24-hour pH-MII monitoring. If >5 reflux events were identified on pH-MII, then subjects were randomized to receive either EES or placebo. Repeat 24-hour pH-MII was performed on day 7 of study treatment and compared to initial pH-MII.
RESULTS: Forty-three premature neonates were enrolled. Of those, 31 neonates were randomized, 15 to EES and 16 to placebo with a median (IQR) pretreatment total reflux events per 24 hours of 23 (16-40) and 29 (12-40), respectively. Day 7 total events per 24 hours decreased by 4 events in the EES group to 19 (15-33) and by 10 events in the placebo group to 19 (11-26) (P = 0.09). There were no differences in pretreatment and day 7 acidic and nonacidic reflux, proximal reflux, total or percent reflux time, median or longest bolus clearance time, or nurse-reported apnea events between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Enteral EES did not decrease reflux events on 24-hour pH-MII at the dose studied. Therefore, it may be ineffective in the treatment of GERD in premature neonates.
METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, eligible premature neonates with clinical signs of GERD underwent 24-hour pH-MII monitoring. If >5 reflux events were identified on pH-MII, then subjects were randomized to receive either EES or placebo. Repeat 24-hour pH-MII was performed on day 7 of study treatment and compared to initial pH-MII.
RESULTS: Forty-three premature neonates were enrolled. Of those, 31 neonates were randomized, 15 to EES and 16 to placebo with a median (IQR) pretreatment total reflux events per 24 hours of 23 (16-40) and 29 (12-40), respectively. Day 7 total events per 24 hours decreased by 4 events in the EES group to 19 (15-33) and by 10 events in the placebo group to 19 (11-26) (P = 0.09). There were no differences in pretreatment and day 7 acidic and nonacidic reflux, proximal reflux, total or percent reflux time, median or longest bolus clearance time, or nurse-reported apnea events between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Enteral EES did not decrease reflux events on 24-hour pH-MII at the dose studied. Therefore, it may be ineffective in the treatment of GERD in premature neonates.