Botulinum toxin type A versus 5-Fluorouracil in treatment of keloid.

Most therapeutic approaches for keloids remain clinically unsatisfactory. In the last years, intralesional botulinum toxin-A (IL BTX-A) was proposed for treatment of keloids. Our aim of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy of IL BTX-A and IL 5-Fluorouracil (IL 5-FU) in treatment of keloids. A total of 50 patients with keloids were included in the study, 22 patients (with 26 keloids) were treated with IL BTX-A monthly for up to 6 months and other 22 patients (with 27 keloids) were treated with IL 5-FU weekly for up to 6 weeks, while the remaining 6 patients, each having multiple keloids, were treated with both IL BTX-A for some lesions (8 keloids) and IL 5-FU for their remaining lesions (8 keloids). The clinical improvement was assessed according to flattening of the lesions. Side effects were recorded. A significantly better therapeutic response of keloids was detected after IL BTX-A than IL 5-FU (P = 0.041). IL BTX-A achieved excellent and good flattening of the lesions (58.8% and 20.6%) compared to (31.4% and 17.1%) after IL 5-FU, respectively. In BTX-A treated group, there was no statistically significant difference between the clinical response in small lesions compared to medium and large ones (P = 0.476). While in 5-FU treated group, small and medium lesions showed significantly better response than larger ones (P = 0.009). IL BTX-A caused fewer side effects than IL 5-FU, less pain, itching, no hyperpigmentation and less recurrence. Both IL BTX-A and IL 5-FU showed positive results in treatment of keloids. However, IL BTX-A showed higher clinical efficacy even in large size keloids with less side effects.