Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis · 2019
Development and validation of a chiral UHPLC-MS method for the analysis of cysteine enantiomers in biological samples.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pucciarini Lucia, González-Ruiz Víctor, Zangari Joséphine, Martinou Jean-Claude, Natalini Benedetto, Sardella Roccaldo, Rudaz Serge
Аннотация
For years, d-amino acids were thought to have a minor function in biological processes compared to that of l-enantiomers. Recently, many studies have shown that d-amino acids are present in high concentrations in microorganisms, plants, mammals and humans and execute specific biological functions. One relevant example is that of d-cysteine, whose hydrogen sulfide-producing properties have been found to protect neurons against oxidative stress and to promote dendritic development. Herein, we introduce a chiral LCMS method for the rapid determination of cysteine enantiomers under polar ionic elution conditions (MeOH/MeCN/H2O 49/49/2 v/v/v, containing 50 mM formic acid and 50 mM ammonium formate) developed on a Chiralpak® ZWIX(+) chiral stationary phase. Cysteine enantiomers were analysed in biological samples after efficient reduction of the disulfide bond in cystine; the latter was achieved with the use of 1,4-dithio-dl-threitol as a reducing agent. A baseline resolution (RS = 2.7) was obtained, and the d-enantiomer eluted before the l-enantiomer. For the enantioselective analysis, cysteine was labelled with AccQ-Tag reagent, resulting in improved chromatographic behaviour and MS detection sensitivity. The method was validated according to the Food and Drug Administration guidelines. Good linearity was determined in the ranges of 0.05-0.50 mg/L for d-cysteine and 0.11-0.56 mg/L for l-cysteine. The repeatability and intermediate precision were found to be lower than 4.0%, with trueness ranging from 95.6 to 100.2% for both enantiomers. The LOD and LOQ values were 0.02 and 0.05 mg/L for d-cysteine and 0.04 and 0.11 mg/L for l-cysteine, respectively. The method was successfully applied to cell culture samples treated with d-cysteine.