m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2020

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Blunt Chest Trauma-Suspected Cardiac Injury.

Клинические рекомендацииСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Expert Panels on Cardiac Imaging and Thoracic Imaging, Stojanovska Jadranka, Hurwitz Koweek Lynne M, Chung Jonathan H, Ghoshhajra Brian B, Walker Christopher M, Beache Garth M, Berry Mark F, Colletti Patrick M, Davis Andrew M, Hsu Joe Y, Khosa Faisal, Kicska Gregory A, Kligerman Seth J, Litmanovich Diana, Maroules Christopher D, Meyersohn Nandini, Syed Mushabbar A, Tong Betty C, Villines Todd C, Wann Samuel, Wolf Stephen J, Kanne Jeffrey P, Abbara Suhny

Аннотация

Blunt cardiac injuries range from myocardial concussion (commotio cordis) leading to fatal ventricular arrhythmias to myocardial contusion, cardiac chamber rupture, septal rupture, pericardial rupture, and valvular injuries. Blunt injuries account for one-fourth of the traumatic deaths in the United States. Chest radiography, transthoracic echocardiography, CT chest with and without contrast, and CT angiography are usually appropriate as the initial examination in patients with suspected blunt cardiac injury who are both hemodynamically stable and unstable. Transesophageal echocardiography and CT heart may be appropriate as examination in patients with suspected blunt cardiac injuries. This publication of blunt chest trauma-suspected cardiac injuries summarizes the literature and makes recommendations for imaging based on the available data and expert opinion. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты