Risk management and healthcare policy · 2021
Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Predictors of True Therapeutic Inertia on Patients with Hypertension in a Primary Care Clinic in Thailand.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sornsenee Phoomjai, Vichitkunakorn Polathep, Choomalee Kittisakdi, Romyasamit Chonticha
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Hypertension (HT) has a significant impact on health care worldwide. Therapeutic inertia (TI) is defined as the failure to intensify therapy in the absence of an optimal goal and is widely used as a quality of care parameter. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected many health-care systems, including HT care. Therefore, the present study assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on TI and its predictors in patients with HT.
METHODS: The electronic medical records of patients with HT who attended a primary care clinic at a tertiary hospital during pre-COVID-19 (February 2019 to February 2020) and COVID-19 (March to August 2020) periods were reviewed.
RESULTS: Our study included 6089 visits during the 12-month pre-COVID-19 period and 2852 visits during the 6-month COVID-19 period. Most of the baseline characteristics of the HT patients were not significantly different between the two time periods. During the COVID-19 period, the percentage of uncontrolled HT visits decreased from 43% to 31%. Similarly, the prevalence of TI decreased from 81% to 77%. False TI was predominantly due to physicians' concerns regarding the in-clinic blood pressure measurement being inaccurate during both the periods.
CONCLUSION: After readjustment for the physicians 'reasons, the true TI was 64% and 60% in the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 period. For adjusted physician and patient-related factors, multilevel modeling was used. Senior medical staff visits, elderly patients, prior diabetes mellitus diagnosis, patients who used more than one type of anti-HT medication, and patients with systolic blood pressure >150 mmHg were all predictors of TI. The COVID-19 period, on the other hand had no effect on TI with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.01).
METHODS: The electronic medical records of patients with HT who attended a primary care clinic at a tertiary hospital during pre-COVID-19 (February 2019 to February 2020) and COVID-19 (March to August 2020) periods were reviewed.
RESULTS: Our study included 6089 visits during the 12-month pre-COVID-19 period and 2852 visits during the 6-month COVID-19 period. Most of the baseline characteristics of the HT patients were not significantly different between the two time periods. During the COVID-19 period, the percentage of uncontrolled HT visits decreased from 43% to 31%. Similarly, the prevalence of TI decreased from 81% to 77%. False TI was predominantly due to physicians' concerns regarding the in-clinic blood pressure measurement being inaccurate during both the periods.
CONCLUSION: After readjustment for the physicians 'reasons, the true TI was 64% and 60% in the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 period. For adjusted physician and patient-related factors, multilevel modeling was used. Senior medical staff visits, elderly patients, prior diabetes mellitus diagnosis, patients who used more than one type of anti-HT medication, and patients with systolic blood pressure >150 mmHg were all predictors of TI. The COVID-19 period, on the other hand had no effect on TI with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.01).