Practical laboratory medicine · 2024
Influence of plasma collection tubes on N-glycome in human blood samples.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Zejian, Cui Xiangyi, Zhou Nan, Zhu Lisi, Zhi Yuxiang, Zhang Shuyang
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Quantitative analysis of plasma N-glycome is a promising method for identifying disease biomarkers. This study aimed to investigate the impact of using blood collection tubes with different anticoagulants on plasma N-glycome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a robust mass spectrometry method to profile plasma N-glycomes in two cohorts of healthy volunteers (cohort 1, n = 16; cohort 2, n = 53). The influence of three commonly used blood collection tubes on fully characterized N-glycomic profiles were explored.
RESULTS: Principal component analysis revealed distinct clustering of blood samples based on the collection tubes. Pairwise comparisons demonstrated significant differences between EDTA and heparin plasma in 55 out of 82 quantified N-glycan traits, and between EDTA and citrate plasma in 62 out of 82 traits. These differences encompassed various N-glycan features, including glycan type, sialylation, galactosylation, fucosylation, and bisection. Trends in N-glycan variations in citrate and heparin plasma were largely consistent compared to EDTA plasma. In correlation analysis (EDTA vs. heparin; EDTA vs. citrate), Pearson's correlation coefficients were consistently higher than 0.7 for the majority of N-glycan traits.
CONCLUSION: Sample matrix variations impact plasma N-glycome measurements. Caution is crucial when comparing samples from different plasma collection tubes in glycomics projects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a robust mass spectrometry method to profile plasma N-glycomes in two cohorts of healthy volunteers (cohort 1, n = 16; cohort 2, n = 53). The influence of three commonly used blood collection tubes on fully characterized N-glycomic profiles were explored.
RESULTS: Principal component analysis revealed distinct clustering of blood samples based on the collection tubes. Pairwise comparisons demonstrated significant differences between EDTA and heparin plasma in 55 out of 82 quantified N-glycan traits, and between EDTA and citrate plasma in 62 out of 82 traits. These differences encompassed various N-glycan features, including glycan type, sialylation, galactosylation, fucosylation, and bisection. Trends in N-glycan variations in citrate and heparin plasma were largely consistent compared to EDTA plasma. In correlation analysis (EDTA vs. heparin; EDTA vs. citrate), Pearson's correlation coefficients were consistently higher than 0.7 for the majority of N-glycan traits.
CONCLUSION: Sample matrix variations impact plasma N-glycome measurements. Caution is crucial when comparing samples from different plasma collection tubes in glycomics projects.