MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/13554790802368679

Медицинская библиотека · Neurocase · 2008

Role of inflectional regularity and semantic transparency in reading morphologically complex words: evidence from acquired dyslexia.

Hamilton A Cris, Coslett H Branch

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We report two patients with acquired phonological dyslexia who have great difficulty reading affixed words. Experiment 1 demonstrates that both patients' reading performance is influenced by the apparent morphological status of words by comparing the patients' reading of suffixed and pseudo-suffixed words. Experiment 2 was designed to examine reading performance of both regularly and irregularly inflected words. Experiment 3 examines the patients' reading of derivational forms with particular emphasis of the role of 'semantic transparency'. Experiment 4 tested both patients' reading of prefixed words. Finally, Experiment 5 examined performance on a lexical decision task using affixed words. These data support models in which regularly formed inflections and semantically transparent derived forms are subjected to decomposition during processing, whereas irregularly inflected forms and semantically opaque forms may be represented independently. Data are discussed with regard to current 'dual mechanism' models of morphological processing as well as connectionist perspectives, with particular emphasis of the types of data that will ultimately be necessary to arbitrate between the rival theories.

Для цитирования: Hamilton A Cris, Coslett H Branch. Role of inflectional regularity and semantic transparency in reading morphologically complex words: evidence from acquired dyslexia.. Neurocase. 2008. DOI: 10.1080/13554790802368679.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.