Farmacia hospitalaria : organo oficial de expresion cientifica de la Sociedad Espanola de Farmacia Hospitalaria · 2003
[Evolution of antimicrobial use during the years 1996-2000 in a general hospital. A detailed ICU study].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hermosilla Nájera L, Canut Blasco A, Ulibarrena Sanz M, Abásolo Osinaga E, Abecia Inchaurregui L C
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Antimicrobials are a mayor part of hospital pharmacy budgets and must be considered in resource planning and spending projections. This study describes the profile of antibiotic use at a medium-sized hospital (by examining the ICU separately) and analyses its evolution over the period 1996-2000.
METHODS: Descriptive and retrospective study. Pharmacy records were reviewed to identify oral and parenteral antimicrobial agents administered to inpatients. Results were expressed in Daily Defined Doses (DDD) per 100 stays and day.
RESULTS: During the five-year study period 176.162 DDD / 100 s-d of antibiotics were consumed in the ICU, whereas in the rest of the hospital usage was much lower (54.540 DDD / 100 s-d). Aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, penicillins, glycopeptides and carbapenems were the most commonly used groups of antimicrobials in the ICU, and penicillins, cephalosporins, trimethoprim/sulfonamide combinations, aminoglycosides and quinolones in the rest of the hospital.
CONCLUSIONS: ICUs have some special features which make them different to the rest of inpatient areas. Because of that fact we consider important to study this specific patient-care area separately.
METHODS: Descriptive and retrospective study. Pharmacy records were reviewed to identify oral and parenteral antimicrobial agents administered to inpatients. Results were expressed in Daily Defined Doses (DDD) per 100 stays and day.
RESULTS: During the five-year study period 176.162 DDD / 100 s-d of antibiotics were consumed in the ICU, whereas in the rest of the hospital usage was much lower (54.540 DDD / 100 s-d). Aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, penicillins, glycopeptides and carbapenems were the most commonly used groups of antimicrobials in the ICU, and penicillins, cephalosporins, trimethoprim/sulfonamide combinations, aminoglycosides and quinolones in the rest of the hospital.
CONCLUSIONS: ICUs have some special features which make them different to the rest of inpatient areas. Because of that fact we consider important to study this specific patient-care area separately.