Surgical infections · 2000
Coverage of enterococci in community acquired secondary peritonitis: results of a randomized trial.
Клиническое исследованиеКлиническое исследование IV фазыСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Röhrborn A, Wacha H, Schöffel U, Billing A, Aeberhard P, Gebhard B, Böcker I, Schäfer V, Ohmann C
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The increasing number of enterococcal infections in hospitals and reports about the development of resistance of these bacteria make it necessary to review their importance as co-pathogens in secondary peritonitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial on primary therapy of secondary peritonitis was carried out in six centers comparing cephalosporin-based antibiotic therapy to acylaminopenicillin-based therapy.
RESULTS: Enterococci were only cultured in 6 of 110 cases from the abdomen and were found in only 5 cases of postoperative complications. No differences were found between penicillin-based vs. cephalosporin-based therapy.
CONCLUSION: The study supports the view that these bacteria continue to play a minor role in secondary peritonitis. The point has to be emphasized, however, that the patients under study were in relatively good condition (APACHE II median 9 for cephalosporins and 10 for penicillins) and that postoperative cases of peritonitis were excluded.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial on primary therapy of secondary peritonitis was carried out in six centers comparing cephalosporin-based antibiotic therapy to acylaminopenicillin-based therapy.
RESULTS: Enterococci were only cultured in 6 of 110 cases from the abdomen and were found in only 5 cases of postoperative complications. No differences were found between penicillin-based vs. cephalosporin-based therapy.
CONCLUSION: The study supports the view that these bacteria continue to play a minor role in secondary peritonitis. The point has to be emphasized, however, that the patients under study were in relatively good condition (APACHE II median 9 for cephalosporins and 10 for penicillins) and that postoperative cases of peritonitis were excluded.