MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/brainsci10110848

Медицинская библиотека · Brain sciences · 2020

Screening of Cognitive Changes in Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review.

Paiva Andreia F, Nolan Adam, Thumser Charlotte, Santos Flávia H

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Screening and assessment of cognitive changes in adults with Intellectual Disabilities (ID), mainly Down Syndrome (DS), is crucial to offer appropriate services to their needs. We present a systematic review of the existing instruments assessing dementia, aiming to support researchers and clinicians' best practice.

METHODS

Searches were carried out in the databases Web of Science; PubMed; PsycINFO in March 2019 and updated in October 2020. Studies were selected and examined if they: (1) focused on assessing age-related cognitive changes in persons with ID; (2) included adults and/or older adults; (3) included scales and batteries for cognitive assessment.

RESULTS

Forty-eight cross-sectional studies and twenty-seven longitudinal studies were selected representing a total sample of 6451 participants (4650 DS and 1801 with other ID). In those studies, we found 39 scales, questionnaires, and inventories, and 13 batteries for assessing cognitive and behavioural changes in adults with DS and other ID.

CONCLUSION

The most used instrument completed by an informant or carer was the Dementia Questionnaire for Learning Disabilities (DLD), and its previous versions. We discuss the strengths and limitations of the instruments and outline recommendations for future use.

Для цитирования: Paiva Andreia F, Nolan Adam, Thumser Charlotte, Santos Flávia H. Screening of Cognitive Changes in Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review.. Brain sciences. 2020. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10110848.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.