Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
Efficacy of Beclomethasone Dipropionate in Lowering Fecal Calprotectin Levels in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis in Clinical Remission and at Risk of Relapse: The Becalcu Randomized, Controlled Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ginard Daniel, Barreiro-de Acosta Manuel, Nos Pilar, Moraleja Irene, Muñoz Nuñez Fernando, Aldeguer Xavier, Echarri Ana, Villoria Albert, Riestra Sabino, Boscá Watts Marta Maia, González-Lama Yago, Royo Vanesa, Ferreiro-Iglesias Rocío, Iborra Marisa, Elorza Ainara, Fernandez-Pordomingo Alejandra, Sans Miquel, Becalcu study
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Identifying novel treatment strategies for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and at risk of relapse is critical. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in lowering fecal calprotectin (FC) levels in UC patients in clinical remission and at risk of relapse.
METHODS: This multicenter study comprised a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase (part I) and an open-label, non-randomized phase (part II). Eligible participants with UC in clinical remission treated with 5-aminosalicylic acid and with FC levels ≥250 μg/g were randomized to receive 5 mg/day of BDP or placebo for 4 weeks (part I). At week 5, patients with FC ≥100 μg/g were treated with 5 mg/day of BDP for 4 weeks (part II), and FC levels were tested at week 9.
RESULTS: Forty-three patients were randomized: 22 received BDP (group A) and 21 placebo (group B). At week 4, 13 patients (59.1%) in group A and 3 (17.6%) in group B had FC levels <100 μg/g (p value = 0.010). In the double-blind phase of the study, no patient relapsed in group A and 4 in group B (p value = 0.049). Both treatment groups showed a favorable safety profile, with the most common adverse events being gastrointestinal disorders.
CONCLUSION: In this multicenter, randomized clinical trial including patients with UC in clinical remission but with elevated FC, BDP was efficacious in reducing FC and well-tolerated.
METHODS: This multicenter study comprised a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase (part I) and an open-label, non-randomized phase (part II). Eligible participants with UC in clinical remission treated with 5-aminosalicylic acid and with FC levels ≥250 μg/g were randomized to receive 5 mg/day of BDP or placebo for 4 weeks (part I). At week 5, patients with FC ≥100 μg/g were treated with 5 mg/day of BDP for 4 weeks (part II), and FC levels were tested at week 9.
RESULTS: Forty-three patients were randomized: 22 received BDP (group A) and 21 placebo (group B). At week 4, 13 patients (59.1%) in group A and 3 (17.6%) in group B had FC levels <100 μg/g (p value = 0.010). In the double-blind phase of the study, no patient relapsed in group A and 4 in group B (p value = 0.049). Both treatment groups showed a favorable safety profile, with the most common adverse events being gastrointestinal disorders.
CONCLUSION: In this multicenter, randomized clinical trial including patients with UC in clinical remission but with elevated FC, BDP was efficacious in reducing FC and well-tolerated.