Comparison between cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for differential diagnosis of acute meningitis.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Given the difficulty in the differential diagnosis of acute bacterial meningitis (BM) and viral meningitis (VM), we aimed to compare the ability of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, such as lactate, glucose, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP), total white blood cell count, and predominance of neutrophils, as single tests to differentiate microbiologically defined acute BM and VM.
METHODS
CSF samples were divided into three groups: BM (n=17), VM (n=14) (both with the etiological agent identified), and normal control groups (n=26).
RESULTS
All the biomarkers studied were significantly higher in the BM group than in the VM or control groups (p>0.05). CSF lactate showed the best diagnostic clinical performance characteristics: sensitivity (94.12%), specificity (100%), positive and negative predictive value (100 and 97.56%, respectively), positive and negative likelihood ratio (38.59 and 0.06, respectively), accuracy (98.25%), and AUC (0.97). CSF CRP is excellent for screening BM and VM, as its best feature is its specificity (100%). CSF LDH is not recommended for screening or case-finding. LDH levels were higher in Gram-negative diplococcus than in Gram-positive diplococcus. Other biomarkers were not different between Gram-positive and negative bacteria. The highest level of agreement between the CSF biomarkers was between CSF lactate and CRP [kappa coefficient, 0.91 (0.79; 1.00)].
CONCLUSIONS
All markers showed significant differences between the studied groups and were increased in acute BM. CSF lactate is better than the other biomarkers studied for screening acute BM due to its high specificity.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.