m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026

Second-line treatment strategy following CDK4/6 inhibitors for HR-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients: a multicentric, retrospective, observational study.

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Lavigne Olivia, Poumeaud François, Reverdy Thibaut, Huynh Van Tuat, Roces Guillaume, Poupin Gaulthier, Gouillou Maureen, Bobrie Angélique, Donadille Emma, Dalenc Florence, Jacot William, Robert Julien, Fiteni Frédéric

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The standard first-line treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR +) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer is cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy (ET). Optimal therapy after CDK4/6 inhibitors remains to be determined. We aimed to define the appropriate second-line treatment after CDK4/6 inhibitors in a real-life population.

METHODS: Patients who had received CDK4/6 inhibitors with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) for HR + /HER2- metastatic breast cancer were included from March 2017 to May 2021 at five French cancer centers.The primary objective was to describe second-line treatment after primary treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors plus AIs.

RESULTS: We included 381 patients who received CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with AIs as first-line therapy. Patients with progressive disease (N = 165) benefited from a second-line of treatment: 69 (41.8%) were treated with chemotherapy, while 90 (54.6%) received endocrine therapy (ET alone: 59, 35.8%; ET plus targeted therapy: 31, 18.8%).Patients on chemotherapy were younger compared to those receiving ET (p = 0.011). Patients experiencing earlier progression were more likely to benefit from chemotherapy than ET (p = 0.001). Patients with visceral disease at diagnosis were more often treated with chemotherapy. Second-line median PFS was 6.4 months (95% CI [5.0-12.9]) for chemotherapy and 8.4 months (95% CI [5.4-11.7]) for ET ± targeted therapy, with no significant difference (HR 1.08, 95% CI [0.73-1.59], p = 0.70).

CONCLUSION: This French real-world study demonstrates limited progression-free survival benefits across all second-line strategies after CDK4/6 inhibitor progression, highlighting an urgent clinical need for more effective post-progression therapies.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты