MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0188-4409(01)00356-3

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of medical research · 2002

Recurrent epistaxis from Kiesselbach area syndrome in patients suffering from hemorrhoids: fact or fiction?

Mladina Ranko, Cavcic Josip, Subaric Marin

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

It has been found that >90% of patients suffering from recurrent epistaxis from Kiesselbach area syndrome (REKAS) simultaneously suffered from hemorrhoids. To clarify this, the authors decided to investigate in the opposite direction, i.e., to find out whether or not REKAS occurs in patients suffering primarily from hemorrhoids.

METHODS

The study group included 53 randomly selected hospitalized patients with hemorrhoidal disorder (31 males and 22 females: age range 18-57 years). A search for essential clinical signs of REKAS was performed in each patient.

RESULTS

Incidence was not high, although all clinical parameters were nearly the same: dilated vessels in Kiesselbach venous plexus (83.01%) and a positive hereditary factor (92.7%). The only missing factor in patients with hemorrhoids was anterior septal deformity, so frequent in REKAS patients. CONCLUSIONS; The authors conclude that REKAS and hemorrhoidal syndrome are separate clinical entities that are characterized by dilated vessels of similar venous plexus and simultaneous appearance in the same patient or close relatives.

Для цитирования: Mladina Ranko, Cavcic Josip, Subaric Marin. Recurrent epistaxis from Kiesselbach area syndrome in patients suffering from hemorrhoids: fact or fiction?. Archives of medical research. 2002. DOI: 10.1016/s0188-4409(01)00356-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.