MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/17457300.2012.748809

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of injury control and safety promotion · 2013

Prevalence of alcohol, illicit drugs and psychoactive medicines in killed drivers in four European countries.

Legrand Sara-Ann, Gjerde Hallvard, Isalberti Cristina, Van der Linden Trudy, Lillsunde Pirjo, Dias Mario J, Gustafsson Susanne, Ceder Gunnel, Verstraete Alain G

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Our objective was to determine the presence of psychoactive substances in blood of drivers killed in road crashes in four European countries. Data from 1118 drivers of car and vans, killed between 2006 and 2009, were collected in Finland, Norway, Portugal and Sweden. The prevalence of any psychoactive substance ranged between 31 and 48%. Alcohol (≥ 0.1 g/L) was the most common finding, 87% had a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) ≥ .5 g/L. Benzodiazepines (1.8-13.3%) and amphetamines (0-7.4%) were the most prevalent psychoactive medicines and illicit drugs, respectively. Alcohol-drug and drug-drug combinations were rather prevalent. Differences in alcohol/drug findings seemed to reflect differences in use in the countries. More research should be done to develop preventive strategies to reduce the number of alcohol- and drug-related traffic accidents targeting at-risk groups, such as drivers with very high BACs and novice drivers.

Для цитирования: Legrand Sara-Ann, Gjerde Hallvard, Isalberti Cristina, Van der Linden Trudy, Lillsunde Pirjo, Dias Mario J, Gustafsson Susanne, Ceder Gunnel, Verstraete Alain G. Prevalence of alcohol, illicit drugs and psychoactive medicines in killed drivers in four European countries.. International journal of injury control and safety promotion. 2013. DOI: 10.1080/17457300.2012.748809.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.