Heart and vessels · 2024
Thirty-year outcomes of low-intensity anticoagulation for mechanical aortic valve.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sawa Shintaro, Saito Satoshi, Morita Kozo, Miyamoto Shinka, Hattori Masashi, Hino Atomu, Okuzono Yasuhito, Shiozaki Yuji, Echie Yuki, Niinami Hiroshi
Аннотация
The long-term safety, efficacy, and outcomes of low-intensity anticoagulation for mechanical heart valves remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of low-intensity anticoagulation therapy after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a mechanical prosthesis. This retrospective cohort study consulted medical records and conducted a questionnaire to investigate 519 patients who underwent single AVR with the St. Jude Medical bileaflet valve and were in sinus rhythm. All patients were followed up with an international normalized ratio (INR) target of 1.6-2.5, and their INR values were checked throughout the follow-up period. The survival rate, incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), and risk factors for cardiac death and MACCE were investigated. The total follow-up was 9793 patient-years, and the follow-up periods were 19.9 (standard deviation [SD]: 7.9) years. The mean INR was 2.03 (SD: 0.54). Survival rates from cardiac death were 93.6% in 20 years and 85.2% in 30 years. Advanced age ≥ 70 years was the only significant risk factor for cardiac death and MACCE, and the INR < 2.0 was not significant risk factor for MACCE including thromboembolism or bleeding events. Low-intensity anticoagulation with an INR of 1.6-2.5 for patients with sinus rhythm after AVR with a bileaflet mechanical valve is safe and effective, even over 30 years.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansMaleFemaleRetrospective StudiesHeart Valve ProsthesisAnticoagulantsAgedAortic ValveRisk FactorsMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationTime FactorsInternational Normalized RatioFollow-Up StudiesProsthesis DesignSurvival RateThromboembolismIncidencePostoperative Complications