MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7916/d8m62xtc

Медицинская библиотека · Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2018

Longitudinal Follow-up of Impedance Drift in Deep Brain Stimulation Cases.

Wong Joshua, Gunduz Aysegul, Shute Jonathan, Eisinger Robert, Cernera Stephanie, Ho Kwo Wei David, Martinez-Ramirez Daniel, Almeida Leonardo, Wilson Christina A, Okun Michael S, Hess Christopher W

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Impedance is an integral property of neuromodulation devices that determines the current delivered to brain tissue. Long-term variability in therapeutic impedance following deep brain stimulation (DBS) has not been extensively investigated across different brain targets. The aim was to evaluate DBS impedance drift and variability over an extended postoperative period across common DBS targets.

METHODS

Retrospective data from 1,764 electrode leads were included and drawn from 866 DBS patients enrolled in the University of Florida Institutional Review Board-approved INFORM database and analyzed up to 84 months post implantation. An exploratory analysis was conducted to identify trends in impedances using a Mann-Kendall test of trend.

RESULTS

There were 866 patients and 1,764 leads available for analysis. The majority of subjects had Parkinson's disease (60.7%). The mean age at implantation was 58.7 years old and the mean follow-up time was 36.8 months. There were significant fluctuations in the mean impedance of all electrodes analyzed that largely stabilized by 6 months except for the subthalamic nucleus (STN) target, in which fluctuations persisted throughout the duration of follow-up with a continued downward trend (p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION: The drift in impedance observed primarily within the first 6 months is in keeping with prior studies and is likely due to surgical micro-lesioning effects and brain parenchyma remodeling at the electrode-tissue interface, typically at values approximating 1,000 Ω. The differences in impedance trends over time in the various DBS targets may be due to underlying differences in structure and tissue composition.

Для цитирования: Wong Joshua, Gunduz Aysegul, Shute Jonathan, Eisinger Robert, Cernera Stephanie, Ho Kwo Wei David, Martinez-Ramirez Daniel, Almeida Leonardo, Wilson Christina A, Okun Michael S, Hess Christopher W. Longitudinal Follow-up of Impedance Drift in Deep Brain Stimulation Cases.. Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.). 2018. DOI: 10.7916/d8m62xtc.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.