Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2015
How Should Pushing Off or the Use of Assistive Devices Be Incorporated in the Timed Up and Go for Persons With Parkinson Disease?
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Stegemöller Elizabeth L, Schmidt Peter, Hass Chris, Malaty Irene, Okun Michael S, National Parkinson Foundation Quality Improvement Initiative Investigators
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To determine (1) the relationship between assisted timed Up and Go (TUG) performance and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), and (2) whether adjusting the TUG score (adding time) improves the relationship between TUG performance and the PDQ-39 in persons with Parkinson disease (PD) who use assistive devices or push off, or both.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional.
SETTING: Twenty participating National Parkinson Foundation Centers of Excellence.
PARTICIPANTS: Data were obtained from participants (N=6624) without exclusion at the 20 participating sites.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The relationship between TUG scores and PDQ-39 mobility scores was determined using the method of linear least squares. Adjusted scores were determined through minimizing the sum of the squared error.
RESULTS: The correlation between assisted TUG scores and PDQ-39 mobility scores was slightly lower (R(2)=.384) compared with the correlation between nonassisted TUG scores and PDQ-39 mobility scores (R(2)=.409). Adjusting assisted TUG performance scores for push off and for use of an assistive device resulted in a modest increase in correlation (R(2)=.399).
CONCLUSIONS: Applying adjustments to assisted TUG may provide clinically important information for evaluating balance, mobility, and falls, and for determining the most effective therapeutic strategies for persons with PD.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional.
SETTING: Twenty participating National Parkinson Foundation Centers of Excellence.
PARTICIPANTS: Data were obtained from participants (N=6624) without exclusion at the 20 participating sites.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The relationship between TUG scores and PDQ-39 mobility scores was determined using the method of linear least squares. Adjusted scores were determined through minimizing the sum of the squared error.
RESULTS: The correlation between assisted TUG scores and PDQ-39 mobility scores was slightly lower (R(2)=.384) compared with the correlation between nonassisted TUG scores and PDQ-39 mobility scores (R(2)=.409). Adjusting assisted TUG performance scores for push off and for use of an assistive device resulted in a modest increase in correlation (R(2)=.399).
CONCLUSIONS: Applying adjustments to assisted TUG may provide clinically important information for evaluating balance, mobility, and falls, and for determining the most effective therapeutic strategies for persons with PD.