Contraception · 2008
Comparison of a transdermal contraceptive patch vs. oral contraceptives on hemostasis variables.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kluft Cornelis, Meijer Piet, LaGuardia Katherine D, Fisher Alan C
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare effects of the transdermal contraceptive patch, a desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol (EE)-containing, monophasic combination oral contraceptive (COC) and a levonorgestrel/EE-containing, triphasic COC on hemostasis variables.
STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized, open-label study of 104 young women who received six cycles of treatment. Blood was collected at baseline and on treatment; changes by Day 20/Cycle 6 in baseline hemostasis markers [prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F 1+2), plasmin-plasmin inhibitor complex (PAP) and fibrin degradation products (D-dimer)] were assessed.
RESULTS: All contraceptives induced similar increases in F 1+2 and D-dimer. Patch-induced PAP increases were less than with the monophasic and similar to the triphasic COC. Decreases in protein S and increases in sex hormone-binding globulin were greater with the patch than with either COC. Patch-induced increases in activated protein C resistance were greater than with the triphasic and similar to the monophasic COC.
CONCLUSION: These contraceptives appeared to accelerate baseline procoagulation processes to a similar extent and to change coagulation potency variables differently.
STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized, open-label study of 104 young women who received six cycles of treatment. Blood was collected at baseline and on treatment; changes by Day 20/Cycle 6 in baseline hemostasis markers [prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F 1+2), plasmin-plasmin inhibitor complex (PAP) and fibrin degradation products (D-dimer)] were assessed.
RESULTS: All contraceptives induced similar increases in F 1+2 and D-dimer. Patch-induced PAP increases were less than with the monophasic and similar to the triphasic COC. Decreases in protein S and increases in sex hormone-binding globulin were greater with the patch than with either COC. Patch-induced increases in activated protein C resistance were greater than with the triphasic and similar to the monophasic COC.
CONCLUSION: These contraceptives appeared to accelerate baseline procoagulation processes to a similar extent and to change coagulation potency variables differently.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Administration, CutaneousAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultAntifibrinolytic AgentsBiomarkersBlood CoagulationBlood Coagulation FactorsContraceptives, Oral, CombinedDesogestrelEthinyl EstradiolFemaleFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsFibrinolysinHomeostasisHumansLevonorgestrelMiddle AgedPeptide FragmentsProspective StudiesProtein PrecursorsProthrombin