MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i31.9635

Медицинская библиотека · World journal of clinical cases · 2021

Clinical features and literature review related to the material differences in thread rhinoplasty: Two case reports.

Lee Da Woon, Ryu Heongrae, Jang Si-Hyong, Kim Jun Hyuk

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Thread rhinoplasty can trigger a reaction to thread material, which is a foreign body. We compared clinical features induced by absorbable and non-absorbable threads following thread rhinoplasty.

CASE SUMMARY: Two patients who underwent different thread materials showed different clinical courses and different Hounsfield unit (HU) values in computed tomography. Patients with absorbable thread showed high HU values similar to a metallic material, and the HU value of inflammation was similar to vascular tissues with a lot of water (250). In the intraoperative field, absorbable thread materials and micro-abscesses were observed. In contrast, in the case of a non-absorbable thread, an object presumed to be thread was seen on the computed tomography (CT), and the HU value of inflammatory tissues was less than 100. In both patients, post-operative HU decreased to less than 100 and the clinical course improved. In both cases, histopathologic findings revealed foreign body granuloma associated with inflammation.

CONCLUSION

Absorbable threads were more aggressive and are more easily detected on CT.

Для цитирования: Lee Da Woon, Ryu Heongrae, Jang Si-Hyong, Kim Jun Hyuk. Clinical features and literature review related to the material differences in thread rhinoplasty: Two case reports.. World journal of clinical cases. 2021. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i31.9635.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.