Expert review of respiratory medicine · 2024
Imagining the severe asthma decision trees of the future.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bourdin Arnaud, Bardin Phil, Chanez Pascal
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: There are no validated decision-making algorithms concerning severe asthma (SA) management. Future risks are crucial factors and can be derived from SA trajectories.
AREAS COVERED: The future severe asthma-decision trees should revisit current knowledge and gaps. A focused literature search has been conducted.
EXPERT OPINION: Asthma severity is currently defined a priori, thereby precluding a role for early interventions aiming to prevent outcomes such as exacerbations (systemic corticosteroids exposure) and lung function decline. Asthma 'at-risk' might represent the ultimate paradigm but merits longitudinal studies considering modern interventions. Real exacerbations, severe airway hyperresponsiveness, excessive T2-related biomarkers, noxious environments and patient behaviors, harms of OCS and high-doses inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and low adherence-to-effectiveness ratios of ICS-containing inhalers are predictors of future risks. New tools such as imaging, genetic, and epigenetic signatures should be used. Logical and numerical artificial intelligence may be used to generate a consistent risk score. A pragmatic definition of response to treatments will allow development of a validated and applicable algorithm. Biologics have the best potential to minimize the risks, but cost remains an issue. We propose a simplified six-step algorithm for decision-making that is ultimately aiming to achieve asthma remission.
AREAS COVERED: The future severe asthma-decision trees should revisit current knowledge and gaps. A focused literature search has been conducted.
EXPERT OPINION: Asthma severity is currently defined a priori, thereby precluding a role for early interventions aiming to prevent outcomes such as exacerbations (systemic corticosteroids exposure) and lung function decline. Asthma 'at-risk' might represent the ultimate paradigm but merits longitudinal studies considering modern interventions. Real exacerbations, severe airway hyperresponsiveness, excessive T2-related biomarkers, noxious environments and patient behaviors, harms of OCS and high-doses inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and low adherence-to-effectiveness ratios of ICS-containing inhalers are predictors of future risks. New tools such as imaging, genetic, and epigenetic signatures should be used. Logical and numerical artificial intelligence may be used to generate a consistent risk score. A pragmatic definition of response to treatments will allow development of a validated and applicable algorithm. Biologics have the best potential to minimize the risks, but cost remains an issue. We propose a simplified six-step algorithm for decision-making that is ultimately aiming to achieve asthma remission.