Revue des maladies respiratoires · 2012
[Outcomes of a pulmonary rehabilitation program including singing training].
Клиническое исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Herer B
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Respiratory education by singing may be considered in the course of pulmonary rehabilitation to help control breathing and reduce dyspnoea.
METHODS: We have undertaken singing training during pulmonary rehabilitation in 45 patients, mean age 60.1 ± 10.0 years, suffering from COPD (n=37) or other chronic respiratory disorders (n=8). The parameters measured at the beginning and end of course of rehabilitation were: forced vital capacity, FEV1, total lung capacity, residual volume, 6 min walking distance, VO2max, maximum pressure, MRC dyspnoea score, Cincinnati questionnaires and VSRQ (simplified visual respiratory questionnaire).
RESULTS: The following were the principal significant variations observed (initial value, % variation, significance): 6 minutes walk (326 ± 114 m, +13.8%, P=0.006); VO2max (18,1 ± 6.1 ml/kg/min, +8.3%, P=0.01); P max (75 ± 31 W, +14.7%, P=0.001); MRC score (2.3 ± 0.6, -21.7%, P<10(-4)); VSRQ score (34 ± 13, +50.0%, P<10(-6)). There was no significant change in the level of dyspnoea evaluated by the Cincinnati score.
CONCLUSION: These results are in favor of a beneficial effect of singing during pulmonary rehabilitation.
METHODS: We have undertaken singing training during pulmonary rehabilitation in 45 patients, mean age 60.1 ± 10.0 years, suffering from COPD (n=37) or other chronic respiratory disorders (n=8). The parameters measured at the beginning and end of course of rehabilitation were: forced vital capacity, FEV1, total lung capacity, residual volume, 6 min walking distance, VO2max, maximum pressure, MRC dyspnoea score, Cincinnati questionnaires and VSRQ (simplified visual respiratory questionnaire).
RESULTS: The following were the principal significant variations observed (initial value, % variation, significance): 6 minutes walk (326 ± 114 m, +13.8%, P=0.006); VO2max (18,1 ± 6.1 ml/kg/min, +8.3%, P=0.01); P max (75 ± 31 W, +14.7%, P=0.001); MRC score (2.3 ± 0.6, -21.7%, P<10(-4)); VSRQ score (34 ± 13, +50.0%, P<10(-6)). There was no significant change in the level of dyspnoea evaluated by the Cincinnati score.
CONCLUSION: These results are in favor of a beneficial effect of singing during pulmonary rehabilitation.