Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine · 2021
Comparing Before- and After-School Neurocognitive Performance in High School Athletes: Implications for Concussion Management.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Anderson Morgan, Elbin R J, Schatz Philip, Henry Luke, Covassin Tracey
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare before- and after-school neurocognitive performance and total symptoms in a sample of nonconcussed high school athletes.
DESIGN: Repeated-measures, counterbalanced design.
SETTING: Midwest high schools.
PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine nonconcussed high school athletes.
INTERVENTIONS: The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing battery was administered before and after school in a counterbalanced testing order.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Neurocognitive and total symptom scores.
RESULTS: Paired-sample t tests revealed no significant differences in verbal memory (P = 0.43), visual memory (P = 0.44), processing speed (P = 0.94), reaction time (P = 0.16), or total symptoms (P = 0.52) between before- and after-school testing sessions.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study expand on best practice guidelines for baseline and postinjury concussion computerized neurocognitive testing and symptom report administration. This study suggests that sports medicine professionals can administer computerized neurocognitive testing before or after school without concern of confounding factors affecting performance or total symptoms.
DESIGN: Repeated-measures, counterbalanced design.
SETTING: Midwest high schools.
PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine nonconcussed high school athletes.
INTERVENTIONS: The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing battery was administered before and after school in a counterbalanced testing order.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Neurocognitive and total symptom scores.
RESULTS: Paired-sample t tests revealed no significant differences in verbal memory (P = 0.43), visual memory (P = 0.44), processing speed (P = 0.94), reaction time (P = 0.16), or total symptoms (P = 0.52) between before- and after-school testing sessions.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study expand on best practice guidelines for baseline and postinjury concussion computerized neurocognitive testing and symptom report administration. This study suggests that sports medicine professionals can administer computerized neurocognitive testing before or after school without concern of confounding factors affecting performance or total symptoms.