Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024
Impact of twice-daily budesonide foam administration on early clinical response and endoscopic remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: a post hoc analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Watanabe Kenji, Hirai Fumihito, Kobayashi Kiyonori, Takeuchi Ken, Kurosu Shinsuke, Inagaki Katsutoshi, Iwayama Ken-Ichi, Naganuma Makoto
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Early treatment response of ulcerative colitis (UC) symptom resolution is desirable. This post hoc analysis evaluated efficacy outcomes, including endoscopic remission, by responder status and the influence of once-daily (QD) versus twice-daily (BID) budesonide foam dosing in patients with UC.
METHODS: Data were pooled from phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials of budesonide rectal foam QD or BID or placebo for up to 12 weeks. Outcomes were evaluated by treatment and budesonide administration regimen and by responder group: early (rectal bleeding subscore [RBS] 0 from Week 2 through Week 6), delayed (RBS 0 at Week 6), and nonresponder (RBS > 0 at Week 6).
RESULTS: The main analysis set included 55 (QD) and 120 (BID) budesonide-treated patients and 116 placebo-treated patients. At Week 6, the trend in early response rate was significant among treatment groups (BID, 45.3%; QD, 32.1%; placebo, 12.8%; P < 0.0001). Among BID recipients, trends for complete endoscopic remission rate (Mayo endoscopic score [MES] = 0) and endoscopic remission rate (MES = 0 or 1) were significant among responder status groups (early responder, 67.4% and 95.4%, respectively; delayed responder, 48.1% and 85.2%; nonresponder, 24.0% and 64.0%; P < 0.001 for both). Regardless of the administration regimen, most early responders achieved endoscopic remission at Week 6. Among responder status groups, early responders' cumulative non-relapse period was greatest (P = 0.07).
CONCLUSION: A BID budesonide administration regimen is preferred to increase the probability of early response and, following endoscopic remission, a better prognosis after stopping treatment.
METHODS: Data were pooled from phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials of budesonide rectal foam QD or BID or placebo for up to 12 weeks. Outcomes were evaluated by treatment and budesonide administration regimen and by responder group: early (rectal bleeding subscore [RBS] 0 from Week 2 through Week 6), delayed (RBS 0 at Week 6), and nonresponder (RBS > 0 at Week 6).
RESULTS: The main analysis set included 55 (QD) and 120 (BID) budesonide-treated patients and 116 placebo-treated patients. At Week 6, the trend in early response rate was significant among treatment groups (BID, 45.3%; QD, 32.1%; placebo, 12.8%; P < 0.0001). Among BID recipients, trends for complete endoscopic remission rate (Mayo endoscopic score [MES] = 0) and endoscopic remission rate (MES = 0 or 1) were significant among responder status groups (early responder, 67.4% and 95.4%, respectively; delayed responder, 48.1% and 85.2%; nonresponder, 24.0% and 64.0%; P < 0.001 for both). Regardless of the administration regimen, most early responders achieved endoscopic remission at Week 6. Among responder status groups, early responders' cumulative non-relapse period was greatest (P = 0.07).
CONCLUSION: A BID budesonide administration regimen is preferred to increase the probability of early response and, following endoscopic remission, a better prognosis after stopping treatment.