Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2015
Adverse events in mobility-limited and chronically ill elderly adults participating in an exercise intervention study supported by general practitioner practices.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hinrichs Timo, Bücker Bettina, Wilm Stefan, Klaaßen-Mielke Renate, Brach Michael, Platen Petra, Moschny Anna
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To present detailed adverse event (AE) data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a home-based exercise program delivered to an elderly high-risk population by an exercise therapist after medical clearance from a general practitioner (GP).
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: General practitioner practices and participant homes.
PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling, chronically ill, mobility-limited individuals aged 70 and older (mean 80 ± 5) participating in a RCT of an exercise program (HOMEfit; ISRCTN17727272) (N = 209; n = 106 experimental, n = 103 control; 74% female).
INTERVENTION: A 12-week multidimensional home-based exercise program (experimental) versus baseline physical activity counseling (control). An exercise therapist delivered both interventions to participants during counseling sessions at the GP's practice and on the telephone.
MEASUREMENTS: Adverse events were documented at least at every counseling session and assessed by the GP and an AE manager.
RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one AEs were reported in 47% (n = 99) of all participants. Twenty-one (14%) events were classified as serious. In six events (4%; n = 4 experimental, n = 2 control), participation in the study had to be discontinued immediately. In 25 events (17%; n = 9 experimental, n = 16 control), the intervention had to be suspended. The intervention was determined to have caused two events (both nonserious and in the experimental group).
CONCLUSION: Even though the program appears to be safe, high morbidity unrelated to exercise can constitute a critical challenge for sustained exercise participation.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: General practitioner practices and participant homes.
PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling, chronically ill, mobility-limited individuals aged 70 and older (mean 80 ± 5) participating in a RCT of an exercise program (HOMEfit; ISRCTN17727272) (N = 209; n = 106 experimental, n = 103 control; 74% female).
INTERVENTION: A 12-week multidimensional home-based exercise program (experimental) versus baseline physical activity counseling (control). An exercise therapist delivered both interventions to participants during counseling sessions at the GP's practice and on the telephone.
MEASUREMENTS: Adverse events were documented at least at every counseling session and assessed by the GP and an AE manager.
RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one AEs were reported in 47% (n = 99) of all participants. Twenty-one (14%) events were classified as serious. In six events (4%; n = 4 experimental, n = 2 control), participation in the study had to be discontinued immediately. In 25 events (17%; n = 9 experimental, n = 16 control), the intervention had to be suspended. The intervention was determined to have caused two events (both nonserious and in the experimental group).
CONCLUSION: Even though the program appears to be safe, high morbidity unrelated to exercise can constitute a critical challenge for sustained exercise participation.