MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Family medicine · 1997

Evaluating domestic partner abuse in a family practice clinic.

Pan H S, Ehrensaft M K, Heyman R E, O'Leary K D, Schwartz R

СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES

Although national surveys indicate that approximately 2 million women are victims of severe physical aggression by their partners each year, these women are underidentified by physicians. The assessment by medical personnel of partner abuse is hampered by lack of a simple and reliable instrument that systematically and quickly determines the occurrence and effect of abuse among patients.

METHODS

Ninety (58% of an eligible pool) consecutive, consenting, eligible female patients at a suburban family practice clinic at a tertiary university hospital completed the Partner Abuse Interview to evaluate the 1-year prevalence and effect of abuse.

RESULTS

The Partner Abuse Interview required as little as 3 minutes to administer. Results obtained with the interview instrument were internally consistent. Interrater reliability was high for the diagnosis of partner relationship problems with physical abuse by males, as reported by females. Approximately 15% of the women reported having sustained injury or being fearful of their partners as a result of their partners' physical aggression in the past year.

CONCLUSIONS

The Partner Abuse Interview is a simple and reliable instrument that could be adapted for use by medical personnel to assess incidents of abuse among patients.

Для цитирования: Pan H S, Ehrensaft M K, Heyman R E, O'Leary K D, Schwartz R. Evaluating domestic partner abuse in a family practice clinic.. Family medicine. 1997.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.