MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102377

Медицинская библиотека · Current problems in cardiology · 2024

Clinical outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Salazar Adolfo Martinez, Panama Gabriel, Kim Andrew Geunwon, Rayamajhi Supratik, Abela George S

МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a known chronic condition that can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Patients who develop PH due to thromboembolic disease are catalogued as chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Anticoagulation remains a topic of interest in these patients. PUBMED, EMBASE and COCHRANE databases were searched by two investigators until December 2023. Information was analyzed for all-cause mortality, venous thromboembolism and major bleeding. We included a total of 10 studies in this meta-analysis. Our pooled analysis demonstrated that DOACs were non-inferior in all-cause mortality [OR 0.88, 95 % CI (0.48, 1.61)], venous thromboembolism [OR 1.00, 95 % CI (0.50, 1.98)] and major bleeding [OR 0.78, 95 % CI (0.43, 1.40)] when compared to VKAs. In conclusion, our meta-analysis supports the use of DOACs in patients with CTEPH. Further randomized trials are still needed to confirm our results in terms of safety and mortality.

Для цитирования: Salazar Adolfo Martinez, Panama Gabriel, Kim Andrew Geunwon, Rayamajhi Supratik, Abela George S. Clinical outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.. Current problems in cardiology. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102377.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.