MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2351

Медицинская библиотека · Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2018

A phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of remimazolam (CNS 7056) compared with placebo and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Rex Douglas K, Bhandari Raj, Desta Taddese, DeMicco Michael P, Schaeffer Cynthia, Etzkorn Kyle, Barish Charles F, Pruitt Ronald, Cash Brooks D, Quirk Daniel, Tiongco Felix, Sullivan Shelby, Bernstein David

Клиническое исследование II фазыСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Remimazolam is an ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine.

METHODS

We performed a randomized double-blind comparison of remimazolam to placebo for outpatient colonoscopy. This study design was a requirement of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. An additional group was randomized to open-label midazolam administered according to its package insert instructions (the randomization ratio for remimazolam:placebo:midazolam was 30:6:10). Study medications were administered under the supervision of the endoscopist, without any involvement of an anesthesia specialist. Patients were given 50 to 75 μg of fentanyl before receiving study medications. Patients who failed to achieve adequate sedation in any arm were rescued with midazolam dosed at the investigator's discretion. The primary endpoint was a composite that required 3 criteria be met: completion of the colonoscopy, no need for rescue medication, and ≤5 doses of remimazolam or placebo in any 15-minute interval (≤3 doses of midazolam in any 12-minute interval in the open-label midazolam arm).

RESULTS

There were 461 randomized patients in 12 U.S. sites. The primary endpoint was met for remimazolam, placebo, and midazolam in 91.3%, 1.7%, and 25.2% of patients, respectively (P < .0001 for remimazolam vs placebo). Patients administered remimazolam received less fentanyl, had faster recovery of neuropsychiatric function, were ready for discharge earlier, and felt back to normal sooner than patients with both placebo and midazolam. Hypotension was less frequent with remimazolam, and hypoxia occurred in 1% of patients with remimazolam or midazolam. There were no treatment-emergent serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam can be administered safely under the supervision of endoscopists for outpatient colonoscopy, and it allows faster recovery of neuropsychiatric function compared with placebo (midazolam rescue) and midazolam. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02290873.).

Для цитирования: Rex Douglas K, Bhandari Raj, Desta Taddese, DeMicco Michael P, Schaeffer Cynthia, Etzkorn Kyle, Barish Charles F, Pruitt Ronald, Cash Brooks D, Quirk Daniel, Tiongco Felix, Sullivan Shelby, Bernstein David. A phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of remimazolam (CNS 7056) compared with placebo and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy.. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.04.2351.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.