MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0898264314532686

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of aging and health · 2014

Gender differences in neighborhood walking in older adults.

Gallagher Nancy Ambrose, Clarke Philippa J, Gretebeck Kimberlee A

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study examined mobility, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, neighborhood (density, destinations, and design), and neighborhood walking in older men (n = 106, 60-99 years, M = 76.78, SD = 8.12) and women (n = 216, 60-99 years, M = 75.81, SD = 8.46).

METHOD/

RESULTS

In hierarchical regression, the variables explained 32% of the variance in neighborhood walking in men (p < .001) and 27% of the variance in women (p < .01). Self-efficacy (β = .49, p < .01), density (β= .22, p < .05), and design (β= .21, p = .05) were associated with walking in men. Significant design characteristics included sidewalks (β= .25, p < .05) and crime (β= .36, p < .01). In women, self-efficacy (β= .48, p < .001) and destinations (β= .15, p < .05) were associated with walking. Walking was associated with self-efficacy for walking despite individual barriers in women (β= .38, p < .001) and neighborhood barriers in men (β= .30, p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Walking interventions targeting older women should incorporate local destinations. In older men, interventions should consider neighborhood sidewalk design and crime. Walking interventions for all older adults should include enhancement of self-efficacy, but gender differences may exist in the types of self-efficacy on which to focus.

Для цитирования: Gallagher Nancy Ambrose, Clarke Philippa J, Gretebeck Kimberlee A. Gender differences in neighborhood walking in older adults.. Journal of aging and health. 2014. DOI: 10.1177/0898264314532686.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.