MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00004770-200103000-00011

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of endodontics · 2001

Evaluation of the effect of EDTAC, CDTA, and EGTA on radicular dentin microhardness.

Cruz-Filho A M, Sousa-Neto M D, Saquy P C, Pécora J D

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The effect of EDTAC (ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid plus Cetavion, an ammonium surfactant), CDTA (cyclohexane-1,2-diaminetetra-acetic acid), and EGTA (ethylene glycol-bis-(beta-amino-ethyl ether) N,N,N',N'-tetra-acetic acid) on the microhardness of radicular dentin of the cervical third of human teeth was studied. Five newly extracted maxillary incisors were sectioned transversely at the cementoenamel junction, and the crowns were discarded. The roots were embedded in blocks of high-speed polymerized acrylic resin and cut transversely into 1-mm sections. The second slice of the cervical third of the root of each tooth was sectioned and divided into four parts. Each part was placed on an acrylic disc that was used as a base for microhardness measurement. Fifty microliters of 15% EDTAC, 1% CDTA, or 1% EGTA were applied to the dentin surface. Deionized and distilled water was used as control. Dentin microhardness was then measured with a Vicker's microhardness apparatus with a load of 50 g for 15 s. Statistical analysis showed that the three chelating solutions significantly reduced dentin microhardness when compared with water; however, there was no statistically significant difference among the three solutions.

Для цитирования: Cruz-Filho A M, Sousa-Neto M D, Saquy P C, Pécora J D. Evaluation of the effect of EDTAC, CDTA, and EGTA on radicular dentin microhardness.. Journal of endodontics. 2001. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200103000-00011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.