The International journal on drug policy · 2010
An external evaluation of a peer-run outreach-based syringe exchange in Vancouver, Canada.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hayashi Kanna, Wood Evan, Wiebe Lee, Qi Jiezhi, Kerr Thomas
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Vancouver, Canada has been the site of an epidemic of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) amongst injection drug users (IDU). In response, the Vancouver Area Network of Drug Users (VANDU) initiated a peer-run outreach-based syringe exchange programme (SEP) called the Alley Patrol. We conducted an external evaluation of this programme, using data obtained from the Vancouver Injection Drug Users Study (VIDUS).
METHODS: Using generalised estimating equations (GEE) we examined the prevalence and correlates of use of the SEP amongst VIDUS participants followed from 1 December 2000 to 30 November 2003.
RESULTS: Of 854 IDU, 233 (27.3%) participants reported use of the SEP during the study period. In multivariate GEE analyses, service use was positively associated with living in unstable housing (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39-2.40), daily heroin injection (AOR=1.31, 95% CI: 1.01-1.70), daily cocaine injection (AOR=1.34, 95% CI: 1.03-1.73), injecting in public (AOR=3.07, 95% CI: 2.32-4.06), and negatively associated with needle reuse (AOR=0.65, 95% CI: 0.46-0.92).
CONCLUSION: The VANDU Alley Patrol SEP succeeded in reaching a group of IDU at heightened risk for adverse health outcomes. Importantly, access to this service was associated with lower levels of needle reuse. This form of peer-based SEP may extend the reach of HIV prevention programmes by contacting IDU traditionally underserved by conventional syringe exchange programmes.
METHODS: Using generalised estimating equations (GEE) we examined the prevalence and correlates of use of the SEP amongst VIDUS participants followed from 1 December 2000 to 30 November 2003.
RESULTS: Of 854 IDU, 233 (27.3%) participants reported use of the SEP during the study period. In multivariate GEE analyses, service use was positively associated with living in unstable housing (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39-2.40), daily heroin injection (AOR=1.31, 95% CI: 1.01-1.70), daily cocaine injection (AOR=1.34, 95% CI: 1.03-1.73), injecting in public (AOR=3.07, 95% CI: 2.32-4.06), and negatively associated with needle reuse (AOR=0.65, 95% CI: 0.46-0.92).
CONCLUSION: The VANDU Alley Patrol SEP succeeded in reaching a group of IDU at heightened risk for adverse health outcomes. Importantly, access to this service was associated with lower levels of needle reuse. This form of peer-based SEP may extend the reach of HIV prevention programmes by contacting IDU traditionally underserved by conventional syringe exchange programmes.