MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.12.023

Медицинская библиотека · American heart journal · 2014

Clevidipine in acute heart failure: Results of the A Study of Blood Pressure Control in Acute Heart Failure-A Pilot Study (PRONTO).

Peacock W Frank, Chandra Abhinav, Char Douglas, Collins Sean, Der Sahakian Guillaume, Ding Li, Dunbar Lala, Fermann Gregory, Fonarow Gregg C, Garrison Norman, Hu Ming-Yi, Jourdain Patrick, Laribi Said, Levy Phillip, Möckel Martin, Mueller Christian, Ray Patrick, Singer Adam, Ventura Hector, Weiss Mason, Mebazaa Alex

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Rapid blood pressure (BP) control improves dyspnea in hypertensive acute heart failure (AHF). Although effective antihypertensives, calcium-channel blockers are poorly studied in AHF. Clevidipine is a rapidly acting, arterial selective intravenous calcium-channel blocker. Our purpose was to determine the efficacy and safety of clevidipine vs standard-of-care intravenous antihypertensive therapy (SOC) in hypertensive AHF.

METHODS

This is a randomized, open-label, active control study of clevidipine vs SOC in emergency department patients with AHF having systolic BP ≥160 mm Hg and dyspnea ≥50 on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Coprimary end points were median time to, and percent attaining, a systolic BP within a prespecified target BP range (TBPR) at 30 minutes. Dyspnea reduction was the main secondary end point.

RESULTS

Of 104 patients (mean [SD] age 61 [14.9] years, 52% female, 80% African American), 51 received clevidipine and 53 received SOC. Baseline mean (SD) systolic BP and VAS dyspnea were 186.5 (23.4) mm Hg and 64.8 (19.6) mm. More clevidipine patients (71%) reached TBPR than did those receiving SOC (37%; P = .002), and clevidipine was faster to TBPR (P = .0006). At 45 minutes, clevidipine patients had greater mean (SD) VAS dyspnea improvement than did SOC patients (-37 [20.9] vs -28 mm [21.7], P = .02), a difference that remained significant up to 3 hours. Serious adverse events (24% vs 19%) and 30-day mortality (3 vs 2) were similar between clevedipine and SOC, respectively, and there were no deaths during study drug administration.

CONCLUSIONS

In hypertensive AHF, clevidipine safely and rapidly reduces BP and improves dyspnea more effectively than SOC.

Для цитирования: Peacock W Frank, Chandra Abhinav, Char Douglas, Collins Sean, Der Sahakian Guillaume, Ding Li, Dunbar Lala, Fermann Gregory, Fonarow Gregg C, Garrison Norman, Hu Ming-Yi, Jourdain Patrick, Laribi Said, Levy Phillip, Möckel Martin, Mueller Christian, Ray Patrick, Singer Adam, Ventura Hector, Weiss Mason, Mebazaa Alex. Clevidipine in acute heart failure: Results of the A Study of Blood Pressure Control in Acute Heart Failure-A Pilot Study (PRONTO).. American heart journal. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.12.023.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.