Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 1998
Reduced responsiveness to endothelin-1 in peripheral resistance vessels of patients with syndrome X.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Newby D E, Flint L L, Fox K A, Boon N A, Webb D J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the contribution and action of nitric oxide and endothelin-1 in peripheral resistance vessels of patients with syndrome X.
BACKGROUND: Patients with syndrome X may have a generalized disorder of vascular and endothelial function, promoting vasospasm.
METHODS: Changes in blood flow responses to intrabrachial infusion of the endothelium-dependent vasodilators substance P and acetylcholine, the endothelium-independent nitric oxide donor sodium nitroprusside and the endothelin type A (ET(A)) receptor antagonist BQ-123 were assessed using venous occlusion plethysmography in 10 patients with syndrome X and 10 matched control subjects. Vasoconstrictor responses to the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-N(G)-monomethyl arginine (L-NMMA) and endothelin-1 were also determined.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the responses to acetylcholine, substance P, sodium nitroprusside or BQ-123 between patients and control subjects. However, despite similar degrees of vasoconstriction in response to L-NMMA in both groups, endothelin-1 caused a reduction in forearm blood flow of only 20 +/- 2% in patients with syndrome X compared with 35 +/- 3% in matched control subjects at 90 min (p < 0.001). Although plasma endothelin-1 concentrations were not significantly higher in patients with syndrome X (4.8 vs. 4.0 pg/ml, p = 0.17), the vasoconstriction caused by endothelin-1 infusion correlated inversely with plasma endothelin-1 concentrations (r = -0.51, p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with syndrome X had normal basal and stimulated nitric oxide activity and basal endogenous ET(A) receptor-mediated vascular tone. However, despite otherwise normal vascular function, there was reduced responsiveness to exogenous endothelin-1, possibly reflecting overactivity of this system and ET(A) receptor downregulation.
BACKGROUND: Patients with syndrome X may have a generalized disorder of vascular and endothelial function, promoting vasospasm.
METHODS: Changes in blood flow responses to intrabrachial infusion of the endothelium-dependent vasodilators substance P and acetylcholine, the endothelium-independent nitric oxide donor sodium nitroprusside and the endothelin type A (ET(A)) receptor antagonist BQ-123 were assessed using venous occlusion plethysmography in 10 patients with syndrome X and 10 matched control subjects. Vasoconstrictor responses to the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L-N(G)-monomethyl arginine (L-NMMA) and endothelin-1 were also determined.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the responses to acetylcholine, substance P, sodium nitroprusside or BQ-123 between patients and control subjects. However, despite similar degrees of vasoconstriction in response to L-NMMA in both groups, endothelin-1 caused a reduction in forearm blood flow of only 20 +/- 2% in patients with syndrome X compared with 35 +/- 3% in matched control subjects at 90 min (p < 0.001). Although plasma endothelin-1 concentrations were not significantly higher in patients with syndrome X (4.8 vs. 4.0 pg/ml, p = 0.17), the vasoconstriction caused by endothelin-1 infusion correlated inversely with plasma endothelin-1 concentrations (r = -0.51, p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with syndrome X had normal basal and stimulated nitric oxide activity and basal endogenous ET(A) receptor-mediated vascular tone. However, despite otherwise normal vascular function, there was reduced responsiveness to exogenous endothelin-1, possibly reflecting overactivity of this system and ET(A) receptor downregulation.