MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1021/es070424u

Медицинская библиотека · Environmental science & technology · 2007

Analysis of trends in episodic acidification of streams in western Maryland.

Kline Kathleen M, Eshleman Keith N, Morgan Raymond P, Castro Nancy M

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In this study we report on changes in the magnitude and mechanisms of episodic acidification of a small acid-sensitive stream in western Maryland (U.S.) during the 1990s, a period in which wet sulfate deposition declined by 10-25% due to implementation of the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) of 1990. We observed a relatively minor trend in the magnitude of episodic acidification over this period, as measured bytransient changes in acid neutralizing capacity (deltaANC) and minimum values of ANC (ANC(min)) during 22 events sampled prior to and following CAAA implementation. Any relationship to changes in atmospheric deposition appears to be confounded by large hydroclimatological variability between the two sampling periods. Nonetheless, results obtained prior to implementation of the CAAA indicated that the mechanism of episodic acidification was mostly attributable to flushing of accumulated sulfate from the watershed, whereas results obtained post-CAAA indicated domination by base cation dilution. This shift in the mechanism of episodic acidification is qualitatively consistent with hydrochemical theory, as well as with empirical results from surface waters in other regions where dramatic declines in sulfate deposition have taken place.

Для цитирования: Kline Kathleen M, Eshleman Keith N, Morgan Raymond P, Castro Nancy M. Analysis of trends in episodic acidification of streams in western Maryland.. Environmental science & technology. 2007. DOI: 10.1021/es070424u.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.