International endodontic journal · 2007
Penetration depth of a dye marker into dentine using a novel hydrodynamic system (RinsEndo).
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hauser V, Braun A, Frentzen M
Аннотация
AIM: To investigate the efficiency of a hydrodynamic irrigation system compared with conventional cleansing techniques in root canals.
METHODOLOGY: Forty-five freshly extracted single-rooted teeth were de-coronated and their root canals were enlarged to size 30 at the apex. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n = 15) for the final rinsing sequence using 2% NaOCl plus acid fuchsin: group I: static application of irrigant, 3 min; group II: flushing with a syringe; 5-mL NaOCl, 1 min; group III: RinsEndo-system; 5-mL NaOCl, 50 s. Apical extrusion was documented photographically. The roots were sectioned at 2, 4, 6 and 8 mm from their apices and the penetration depths of dye into dentine measured, using a stereomicroscope. Wilcoxon's test and Pearson's chi-squared test were employed to prove statistic relevance.
RESULTS: Greater dye penetration depth into the dentinal tubules was achieved when employing hydrodynamic rinsing procedures. Using this technique, 23% of the specimens were penetrated for more than 50% of their dentine thickness, whereas the results for flushing with a syringe were 12% (static application, 7%). No penetration of dentine occurred in 63% of specimens with static application, 39% flushing with a syringe and 15% using the hydrodynamic system (P < 0.05 Pearson's chi-squared test). Apical extrusion occurred more frequently after hydrodynamic rinsing (extruded specimens: RinsEndo = 80%; static application/flushing with a syringe = 13%; P < 0.05 Pearson's chi-squared test).
CONCLUSIONS: Hydrodynamic rinsing demonstrated an improvement over conventional methods in terms of dentine penetration of a dye marker. A higher risk of apical extrusion with the RinsEndo-system was evident.
METHODOLOGY: Forty-five freshly extracted single-rooted teeth were de-coronated and their root canals were enlarged to size 30 at the apex. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n = 15) for the final rinsing sequence using 2% NaOCl plus acid fuchsin: group I: static application of irrigant, 3 min; group II: flushing with a syringe; 5-mL NaOCl, 1 min; group III: RinsEndo-system; 5-mL NaOCl, 50 s. Apical extrusion was documented photographically. The roots were sectioned at 2, 4, 6 and 8 mm from their apices and the penetration depths of dye into dentine measured, using a stereomicroscope. Wilcoxon's test and Pearson's chi-squared test were employed to prove statistic relevance.
RESULTS: Greater dye penetration depth into the dentinal tubules was achieved when employing hydrodynamic rinsing procedures. Using this technique, 23% of the specimens were penetrated for more than 50% of their dentine thickness, whereas the results for flushing with a syringe were 12% (static application, 7%). No penetration of dentine occurred in 63% of specimens with static application, 39% flushing with a syringe and 15% using the hydrodynamic system (P < 0.05 Pearson's chi-squared test). Apical extrusion occurred more frequently after hydrodynamic rinsing (extruded specimens: RinsEndo = 80%; static application/flushing with a syringe = 13%; P < 0.05 Pearson's chi-squared test).
CONCLUSIONS: Hydrodynamic rinsing demonstrated an improvement over conventional methods in terms of dentine penetration of a dye marker. A higher risk of apical extrusion with the RinsEndo-system was evident.